2026-01-15 23:31:23

I have a question for everyone: why would a major AI model company directly refuse the opportunity to empower the voice assistant of the world's largest ecosystem? They turned down a potential with 235 million active devices. How does this situation resemble the story of "Don't fire me, I'll resign myself"? Or is there some inside information I haven't seen?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

faded_wojak.eth

· 01-17 23:05

Reject such a big cake... unless there's a bigger plan behind it, otherwise you're really out of your mind.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagrant

· 01-17 18:02

There must be some tricks involved; they wouldn't cut themselves off without reason. There must be a big sponsor behind the scenes speaking up.

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 01-16 00:01

nah fr tho, this narrative arc feels off... like watching someone burn their own bridge before it's even crossed? 235m active devices ain't pocket change in the sentiment metrics we're tracking. smells like either (a) they're playing 5d chess we can't see yet, or (b) someone just made a very expensive "fuck around and find out" moment. the discord pulse on this would be *chef's kiss* chaotic rn

Reply0

SchroedingerGas

· 01-16 00:01

Refusal? Is this an IQ tax or part of a bigger chess game... 235 million devices, not tempted, so there must be some unspeakable twists and turns behind the scenes.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-15 23:50

Speaking of which, this matter is indeed strange... 235 million active devices, no one would just give up without a fight.

View OriginalReply0