2026-01-15 23:29:26

Recently, I spent some time researching how AI products actually make money — not just hype concepts.

After looking at many projects, one thing really stands out as different. It’s not noisy, and there’s no sense of rushing for quick gains. The tools they are building, like Sidekicks, feel more like a genuine creative work layer rather than a gimmick. You can train them and shape their capabilities according to your needs — this customizable design approach opens up new possibilities for the creator economy.

Compared to those projects that just pile on concepts, this pragmatic monetization model is actually more worth paying attention to. Truly useful AI tools ultimately need to focus on practical applications and user value.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SolidityNewbie

· 01-18 02:47

The idea of a customizable AI assistant is indeed interesting, much more reliable than those vapor projects. Honestly, the creator economy needs tools that can be practically used, not just hype concepts every day. Tools like Sidekicks can genuinely save time and help make money, which is the right direction for Web3. Finally, I see someone seriously working on something, not just speculating on cryptocurrencies.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationTherapist

· 01-17 06:16

To be honest, I've been using tools like this for a long time. Compared to projects that shout slogans every day, it's definitely more reliable. --- Customization is the key; finally, someone understands what creators really need. --- Practicality combined with monetization sounds good. But is there really anyone making money with this? --- Quiet projects are often the most overlooked, which is the tragedy of the market. --- Sidekicks are indeed interesting, but they're not mature enough yet.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-15 23:59

Hey, this Sidekicks is indeed quite interesting, and the customizable aspect really hits the spot for me. Honestly, I'm tired of those projects that boast all day long; those that work quietly tend to survive better. Training AI to follow your ideas—creators can really use this, it's not a joke. Why are so many people still betting on concepts? Can't they just settle down and see if there's real skill? Wait, can this tool really open up the creator economy? I'm a bit curious. This is what I call practical application, not just raising funds with a name. It seems like some people who are about to get cut a slice of the pie just don't understand this article. Let's talk separately about the customization part—what's the training method? Low-key projects make me even more interested in understanding what's going on. It's 2024, and there's really no need to keep炒概念.

View OriginalReply0

ShadowStaker

· 01-15 23:59

honestly the customizable layer angle is interesting but let me see the actual unit economics first. too many "practical" projects collapse when you run the numbers on user retention vs infrastructure costs tbh

Reply0

SorryRugPulled

· 01-15 23:55

Damn, this is truly innovative, not like those concept coins that just follow the trend and fight with the projects that are like gods. Sidekicks sounds a bit different, can it be customized? Feels much more reliable than those unchanging tools. It's both practical and creator economy, okay, I admit I’m convinced. Let's talk when it’s actually usable. For now, I’m still observing. These days, projects that don’t just talk nonsense are worth paying attention to.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 01-15 23:40

This is the real deal—trainable, customizable, and genuinely productive, not just a conceptual coin that talks the talk. I'm already tired of those projects that keep making empty promises. With Sidekicks' approach, there's definitely substance. We've built up our position, betting that this pragmatic approach will gradually eat into the territory of those air projects.

View OriginalReply0