By 2026, the blockchain storage sector is undergoing change. The drawbacks of traditional cloud services are becoming increasingly apparent—high costs, along with risks of single points of failure and data censorship. In the Sui ecosystem, the Walrus protocol breaks this deadlock with a unique erasure coding and blob storage mechanism.



How does this solution work? Large files are split and dispersed across a global network of nodes, enabling developers, enterprises, and even individual users to access truly censorship-resistant, cost-optimized storage infrastructure. Data is tamper-proof, always accessible, and storage costs can be kept very low.

$WAL is the lifeblood of the entire ecosystem. It serves many functions—paying for storage, incentivizing nodes, governance voting, staking and mining, all with a single token. Holders who stake $WAL can earn network rewards and have a say in community proposals. As the Sui ecosystem expands, more dApps, NFT projects, and enterprise applications are adopting Walrus as their storage of choice, directly driving demand and value for $WAL.

Compared to predecessors like Arweave and Filecoin, Walrus’s advantages are straightforward—storage costs are only a fraction of theirs, and read speeds are even faster. This is thanks to Sui’s high-concurrency Move language and Walrus’s own optimized sharding mechanism. Currently, gaming, AI applications, and social dApps are moving in this direction, and storage demand is exploding.
WAL0,31%
SUI0,72%
AR2,38%
FIL-9,48%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaoDevelopervip
· 01-18 19:44
the erasure coding mechanics here actually remind me of how reed-solomon proofs work in some consensus layers... but ngl, the real question is whether walrus's blob storage can actually handle the throughput demands once those ai apps start scaling. arweave's been around longer so the comparison feels a bit early, no?
Reply0
BlockchainGrillervip
· 01-17 12:11
Wow, can Walrus really push the cost down to such a low level like FIL? It feels a bit exaggerated.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 01-16 20:44
After blowing for so long, there's finally some real substance. Is it true that it's so many times cheaper than FIL?
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtistvip
· 01-15 23:53
Wow, Walrus's cost advantage is incredible. Can it be even faster at a fraction of the price? What about Filecoin?
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnonvip
· 01-15 23:48
WAL is really ridiculously cheap, costing only a fraction of Filecoin. Who can resist that?
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlertvip
· 01-15 23:44
Wow, Walrus has really pushed Arweave and Filecoin to the limit, with costs only a fraction of the original... This is the rhythm of takeoff!
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/vip
· 01-15 23:41
Several times cheaper and faster, this is how it should be. Why is Arweave still just lying there?
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoneyvip
· 01-15 23:38
Wow, if it could really be done at a fraction of the cost, how is Filecoin still alive?
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 01-15 23:30
One-fifth of the cost? If that's true, Filecoin must be getting anxious haha
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin