2026-01-08 07:47:02

Today, I saw on the screen that a certain leading exchange's Alpha product has recently caused quite a bit of criticism in the community. I initially thought it would be an innovative thing, but after launching, it was immediately ridiculed.

Many people complained that the operation experience was not user-friendly, the promised returns were not delivered, and some said that this gameplay was not very fair to retail investors. After browsing through the discussions, I found that the voices of criticism are indeed quite numerous, almost one-sided.

It's quite rare for a new product to flop right after launch. Maybe it’s because some details weren’t handled well, or user expectation management was not properly done. Has anyone used it? How was the real experience?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LowCapGemHunter

· 01-11 07:46

Another product that looks good but actually underperforms. This exchange is really getting worse and worse. It's outrageous that promised returns are not being delivered, retail investors are about to get cut again. This crash was quite satisfying; it was about time someone dissed it. Such a garbage product design and still able to go live, was the PM sleeping? I dare not touch this kind of thing; it feels like a tool for harvesting. One-sided complaints clearly indicate there are real problems. If they don't fix it soon, it might fail. Being unfriendly to retail investors already costs points; the reputation immediately collapses. So this is what you call innovation? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 01-10 00:58

Another "innovation" from a leading exchange, promising Alpha but ending up with Beta This guy's team is really disappointing, and their tactics against retail investors are becoming more obvious They didn't clearly explain the return benchmarks, in plain terms, they just want to harvest retail investors' funds Everyone who has used it is silent, what does that imply?

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 01-08 08:17

Another "revolutionary product" fails spectacularly, hilarious I knew it, major exchanges have been rushing to catch the trend recently, but they haven't thought through how to do it The promised returns are directly shrinking, this trick has been played out in the crypto world Poor experience is one thing, but unfairness to retail investors is the real damaging factor Damn, another "innovative" product working for institutions Big V influencers are making a fortune, retail investors are being wiped out and collapsing Does anyone really make money, or is it all just a show of losses

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 01-08 08:15

It's the same old trick. Big exchanges just love to play this way—brag first and then see. Where did the promised returns go? Retail investors are always the last to know the truth. This time the crash was pretty thorough; probably another overhaul and restart. I just want to know, did the beta testers make any money?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryBaby

· 01-08 08:12

Here is the translation: --- Same old trick, the big exchanges are the best at hyping things up haha --- Unrealized profits? Isn't that standard operation? Retail investors should wake up --- What does the one-sided criticism indicate? The product itself indeed has problems --- I just want to know if the insiders already knew it was going to crash --- The details weren't handled well, just listening makes me want to laugh, obviously rushed for deadlines --- Anyway, I won't touch this kind of new product anymore, I'm afraid of being坑了 --- Wait, how exactly can this product make money? The design logic seems flawed --- It's all about expectation management, in other words, just fooling retail investors --- Major exchange crashes are indeed rare, but that doesn't mean it won't happen again

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 01-08 08:10

Another big project that looked perfect but collapsed immediately after launch, truly impressive. Are the leading exchanges also starting to do this? Could it really be that they have no talent left? The promise of returns was not fulfilled, which is quite harsh—completely feels like a naked cut of the leek. Retail investors are already at a disadvantage, and now it's even more hopeless. Poor expectation management? I think it's just pure deception. This crash is so thorough, I wonder if there are internal issues as well. Has anyone clever used it and wants to share some feedback? Where exactly are the pitfalls? Who would still believe in their next product? Their reputation is basically ruined.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 01-08 08:06

Another "innovative product" has failed spectacularly. What's going on with this exchange? How dare they make such reckless profit promises. Retail investors are always so wronged, forever in the cycle of being harvested. Have any friends experienced this? Share your thoughts, it really feels like they messed up big this time. --- The top exchanges are doing this, it seems they never intended to leave any room for small investors to survive. --- I just want to know if this product was really tested before launch. Why are there so many bugs? --- Was the expectation management poorly handled? Honestly, it's just pure money grabbing. --- One-sided negative reviews are not without reason; this time, it really flopped. --- Oh my God, here we go again. Every time, they draw a tempting cake, but the launch is full of traps. --- The most outrageous thing is the unfulfilled returns. Isn't this just deceiving users? --- Why are top exchanges still using these tricks? I just can't understand.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBarbecue

· 01-08 08:03

Another failed project from a major exchange, hilarious. They dare to write such false profit promises. --- Retail investors haven't paid enough IQ taxes yet, they still jump into the trap. --- There's definitely a mole, absolutely a mole. It's unreasonable to crash so quickly. --- I just want to know how the product manager passed the testing, it's really outrageous. --- Expectations management? They never manage expectations, only harvest. --- I don't really trust the big exchanges' products anymore; I've been burned too many times. --- Heard from friends that the experience is terrible, UI design looks like it's from ancient times. --- Is this what you call innovation from a leading exchange? It's even less reliable than small platforms. --- Here we go again, every new product follows the same pattern. Why bother? --- One-sided criticism shows what? It indicates there are no real users, only people being cut for profits.

View OriginalReply0