Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Market activity is heating up. The market maker incentive program of a well-known project has officially launched, presenting a great opportunity for liquidity providers.
The core gameplay is simple: users participate by providing stable liquidity, and the system calculates rewards based on the total market-making duration. Behind this is an incentive pool of 5 million tokens as support. This is not just a simple trading rebate, but a true form of liquidity mining—you lock assets in trading pairs, maintain market depth, and then earn corresponding reward shares.
For participants, this mechanism not only incentivizes sufficient market liquidity but also allows providers to benefit. As long as they continue to provide liquidity, rewards will keep accumulating. This type of incentive model is becoming increasingly common in the DeFi ecosystem and demonstrates the project's emphasis on long-term liquidity needs.
---
The market maker incentives are back. How long can this last? What’s the status of the last project?
---
Locking liquidity for 6 months, what’s the probability of being rug-pulled in the end? Has anyone calculated it?
---
Talking about long-term liquidity needs sounds nice, but actually it’s just to trap our tokens... But on the other hand, we still have to participate.
---
Wait, is there any fundamental difference between this and Uniswap’s LP mining? Or is it just the same old story with a different name?
---
I bet 5 bucks that the tokens in this incentive pool will drop 50% within three months. If you’re interested, figure it out yourself.
---
Another DeFi liquidity mining project. I just want to know how low the APY will slide before it can truly stabilize.
---
Locking assets for market making? It depends on whether the project team is reliable; otherwise, it's a total loss.
---
It's another market-making incentive, always promising beautiful outcomes, but in the end...
---
Liquidity mining has been played for several years, and it feels like it's time for an upgrade.
---
The continuous accumulation of rewards depends on the tokens maintaining their value, right?
---
Just start the market maker program when ready; the key is having trading pairs with actual traders.
---
A 5 million pool sounds large, but if so many people get a share, it will be diluted.
---
I still prefer simple and straightforward airdrops; locking assets like this is too troublesome.
---
Wait, did this project run away before, or is it fresh blood?
---
Market depth sounds good, but in reality, it just locks retail investors' tokens as liquidity.
---
Locking assets to maintain liquidity sounds simple, but the actual operation requires some thought about the time cost.
---
It's liquidity mining again. Are there still opportunities to buy the dip this round? Feels like big players have already gobbled it all up.
---
Can you keep earning just by providing liquidity continuously? The logic sounds great, but the key is to look at the token release cycle.
---
DeFi is an old trick. No matter how beautifully the incentive pool is designed, the real profits still go to those who get in early.
---
The official launch of the market maker plan, but what about risk assessment? I didn't see any mention of slippage risk or impermanent loss.
---
Calculating based on total market-making duration—what does that mean? Does longer time mean higher returns, or is it a decreasing formula? Need to read the terms carefully.
---
Here comes the story of liquidity mining again. Every time, it claims to be beneficial for project teams, but what about the participants?
---
500 million looks like a lot, but how many market makers will actually share it? It's hard to say.
The questions are, how long is the lock-up period? How is the duration calculated? Are there any hidden risks?
Market makers seem to be a stable job, but in volatile markets, they can go bankrupt at any moment. I think it's better to be cautious.
Honestly, I'm tired of this logic. Every project promotes it like this. In the end, what happens? Token dumps are inevitable.
---
Liquidity mining is back again. Will it be the same as before, where early investors get trapped?
---
Oh no, locking assets requires waiting for the accumulation period. What if the project team runs off in the meantime?
---
It feels a bit like that previous incentive plan by certain projects, where the tokens were dumped to the ground.
---
I want to participate, but I'm afraid of becoming the bagholder.
Wait, what's the difference between this liquidity mining and those zeroing-out projects before? Or is there really something this time?
Is the lock-up period long or not? Don’t let it be another scenario where I lock and you run away.
---
It's liquidity mining again. Why do I feel like I've seen this trick more and more?
---
Locking assets and maintaining a duration, in simple terms, means being locked in. What's the risk?
---
Market maker incentives have been around for so many years. How many have actually made money?
---
Okay, this time instead of grabbing the wool, they’re actually giving some rewards. That's interesting.
---
Continuously providing liquidity... sounds simple, but when the token price crashes, you'll see what impermanent loss really means.
---
The increasing prevalence of DeFi ecosystems indicates that competition is getting fierce. Can the returns be good?
---
Huh, finally a project willing to take liquidity seriously. This is better than pure VC tokens.