Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Privacy coin sector surges again. On the 8th of this month, Josh Swihart, CEO of Electric Coin Company (ECC), the core development company behind Zcash, spoke out on social media, announcing that the entire ECC team has collectively resigned.
The trigger for the incident stems from deep disagreements at the governance level. Swihart openly stated that the majority of the board members of ECC's parent organization, Bootstrap (a non-profit organization)—including Zaki Manian, Christina Garman, Alan Fairless, and Michelle Lai—have clearly deviated from Zcash's original mission. He pointed out that yesterday's alleged dismissal of ZCAM forced the team to make the difficult decision to leave.
"Our employment terms were unilaterally modified," Swihart admitted, "which prevented us from fulfilling our duties with integrity and effectiveness." His words reveal a strong disappointment with the current governance structure.
It is worth noting that Swihart later emphasized that the impact of this turmoil is limited. The Zcash protocol itself remains completely unaffected. The initial reason for the resignation decision was to protect the team's years of technological achievements and prevent them from being subjected to improper governance interference—interference that has made ECC unable to uphold its original mission: to create truly unstoppable privacy currencies.
The departing team has already begun establishing a new company to continue upholding the same privacy principles. This internal split reflects the tensions that can arise between governance structures and technical teams during the rapid development of privacy coin projects. For ZEC holders and the community, how to balance decentralized decision-making with technological stability remains a key issue to watch.
Developers have left, but the protocol still has to continue? I don't think so.
Bootstrap's team has really lost sight of their original intention.
How long will it take for a new team to rise and start messing around again?
ZEC holders really have to take a gamble this time.
ZEC's recent performance is a bit weak; the core team has left. Who will maintain it going forward?
Let's wait and see what new team can come up with.
The story of privacy coins always sounds very appealing, but in the end, it always ends in internal conflicts.
By the way, who is behind these board members pushing things forward? Are they really acting in the best interest of the project?
Losing a lot of ECC teams is somewhat desperate, but if the ZEC protocol itself is fine, then it's not a big problem.
I'm just worried that the new team might cause some trouble again.
Privacy coins still need to focus on solid technical development; internal conflicts are pointless.
Whether they can protect their code achievements with this move depends on how things develop next.