In 2025, the cryptocurrency market underwent a fundamental transformation. The era of retail dominance and extreme volatility is coming to an end, replaced by a new landscape driven by institutional capital, policy guidance, and practical applications working together. How profound is this change? The total market capitalization of Bitcoin and digital assets has surpassed $4 trillion, and their interaction with the US stock market has been completely rewritten.
How significant is the power of policy signals? After the Trump administration took office, the crypto market welcomed political premium expectations such as "national strategic reserves." It sounds promising, but reality is more complex—when the progress of the GENIUS Act did not meet expectations, leveraged positions began to panic and sell off. Bitcoin, which once reached a historical high of $126,000, has fallen back more than 30%, and the US stock market has also experienced turbulence. What does this indicate? Bitcoin is no longer just a "halving cycle asset"; it is now deeply tied to US political struggles and, along with the US stock market, bears the brunt of policy uncertainty.
The entry of institutional funds has changed the game rules but also introduced new risks. The 2025 Bitcoin bull market is mainly driven by institutions—spot ETF assets have already exceeded $160 billion, with Bitcoin holdings accounting for 5.7%-7.4% of circulating supply. It sounds stable, but it is a double-edged sword. When the Federal Reserve adopts a hawkish stance, funds flow out of Bitcoin ETFs on a large scale (BlackRock's IBIT fund alone saw a daily outflow of $180 million), forcing investors to sell more liquid US stocks to meet margin requirements. This cross-market linkage effect is creating a brand new risk transmission chain.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-07 03:26
Damn, we're once again being hijacked by politics. What's the point of playing then?
Genius Act delays just to crash the market by 30%? Isn't that just an illusion at the gambling table? Wake up, everyone.
Institutions entering the market means stability? Laughable. $1.8 billion in daily outflows, looks stable but is actually a death spiral caused by high leverage.
Really, buying BTC now is just like betting on US stock options—it's all about policy bets. We've returned to the starting point.
Wait, with a market cap of 4 trillion yuan, but ETFs taking 5.7% of the circulating supply, aren't you all worried about this concentration?
Let me do the math: next time the Federal Reserve turns hawkish, liquidity crunches will be even more intense.
At least during the retail investor era, there were still dreams. Now, it's just about reading the institutions' faces.
This wave of correction has just begun. Are you ready for the mental breakdown?
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearcher
· 01-06 01:44
When policies change, the market jumps; this time, retail thinking really can't keep up.
Institutions entering the market must accept the fate of being cut; there's no way around it.
The GENIUS Act's delay directly caused a 30% plunge, which is truly outrageous.
Currently, Bitcoin is tightly linked to the US stock market; the policy uncertainty hurdle is hard to overcome.
The $160 billion ETF size sounds impressive, but in reality, it's just a tool to amplify risks.
When the Federal Reserve shifts to hawkish stance, funds will flee; this liquidity trap will be triggered sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 01-05 13:45
Policy expectations collapse and it directly dumps the market, hilarious. Even institutions are just so-so.
View OriginalReply0
ArbitrageBot
· 01-04 20:50
Political premium has collapsed. Only now do I realize how terrifying it is that the GENIUS Act couldn't be pushed forward... Retail investors have already fled, and institutions have become the biggest bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 01-04 20:50
Damn, the policy expectations shattered and dropped by 30% directly. Is this what it feels like to be cut by institutions...
The era of retail investors is really over. Now it's all about big funds.
The GENIUS bill is dragging on, leverage is爆仓, I told you not to go all in on Bitcoin.
Institutions entering the market sounds stable, but in reality, it's tied to the US stock market, and this risk transfer is pretty smooth.
BlackRock is outflowing 180 million a day. Is this a sell-off or what...
A market cap of 4 trillion sounds impressive, but it's deeply tied to political games, which is ridiculous.
So now buying Bitcoin is like betting on Trump’s policies? That’s a bit crazy.
The Fed turning hawkish triggers a chain reaction, and a market crash is really coming.
It feels like retail investors entering now are just helping institutions pump up the market.
Spot ETF surpassing 160 billion looks like institutions aren’t that optimistic, with net outflows and all.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 01-04 20:45
Wow, institutions entering the market just sell off retail investors. Now they can even manipulate the policy to dump the market.
Why hasn't the GENIUS bill been pushed forward yet? Do I have to hold on to leverage like this and fight it out?
A 30% drop overnight, I really can't afford to play this game anymore.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDeveloper
· 01-04 20:43
ngl the leverage cascade here is basically a systemic risk design flaw... when institutions become the primary price discovery mechanism, we lose the decentralized resilience that made crypto interesting in the first place. the etf consolidation mirrors centralized exchange counterparty risk—just dressed up differently
Reply0
ponzi_poet
· 01-04 20:35
Wait, is this what we call "institutionalization"? It just feels like the risk has been shifted from retail investors to big players.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegen
· 01-04 20:27
ngl ser this institutional money takeover hits different... one day we're the alphas aping in, next thing the suits are pulling the strings and we're just watching our leverage get liquidated lmao
Reply0
ILCollector
· 01-04 20:22
Manipulation is manipulation; another way to say it is "institutional entry."
Institutions finish off retail investors and then continue to cut retail investors' US stock positions. This routine is just too clever.
The stock has fallen from 126,000 to now. I’ve always said GENIUS is a joke.
Talking about policy premiums—it's just big capital moving money from one hand to the other.
In 2025, the cryptocurrency market underwent a fundamental transformation. The era of retail dominance and extreme volatility is coming to an end, replaced by a new landscape driven by institutional capital, policy guidance, and practical applications working together. How profound is this change? The total market capitalization of Bitcoin and digital assets has surpassed $4 trillion, and their interaction with the US stock market has been completely rewritten.
How significant is the power of policy signals? After the Trump administration took office, the crypto market welcomed political premium expectations such as "national strategic reserves." It sounds promising, but reality is more complex—when the progress of the GENIUS Act did not meet expectations, leveraged positions began to panic and sell off. Bitcoin, which once reached a historical high of $126,000, has fallen back more than 30%, and the US stock market has also experienced turbulence. What does this indicate? Bitcoin is no longer just a "halving cycle asset"; it is now deeply tied to US political struggles and, along with the US stock market, bears the brunt of policy uncertainty.
The entry of institutional funds has changed the game rules but also introduced new risks. The 2025 Bitcoin bull market is mainly driven by institutions—spot ETF assets have already exceeded $160 billion, with Bitcoin holdings accounting for 5.7%-7.4% of circulating supply. It sounds stable, but it is a double-edged sword. When the Federal Reserve adopts a hawkish stance, funds flow out of Bitcoin ETFs on a large scale (BlackRock's IBIT fund alone saw a daily outflow of $180 million), forcing investors to sell more liquid US stocks to meet margin requirements. This cross-market linkage effect is creating a brand new risk transmission chain.