Why is gold valuable? This question sounds simple, but the underlying logic is constantly changing.
Human consensus on gold is not fixed. It evolves with the times. So what exactly influences this consensus? It boils down to three dimensions—monetary attributes, financial functions, and hedging demand.
Let's start with the monetary aspect.
Today, money can be divided into three categories: physical currency, credit currency, and virtual currency. Which do we use daily? Mostly credit currency. What is credit currency? It’s paper money issued by governments backed by taxes. The government says this piece of paper is worth 100 units, and if the people agree, then it’s worth 100 units—that’s the power of trust.
From this perspective, gold is also a product of consensus. However, its basis of consensus is older and more primitive. Before the emergence of credit currency, gold gained global acceptance because of its scarcity, ease of preservation, and divisibility. And now? The value of gold is constantly being redefined.
This is why studying the logic of gold is essentially studying the evolution of human perceptions of value.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FomoAnxiety
· 6h ago
In simple terms, gold is the oldest form of consensus and is much more stable than those paper currencies.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 01-04 18:52
Basically, it's a consensus game. There's no real difference between gold and the crypto world; it's all about telling a good story to be valuable.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-03 13:25
Basically, it's a consensus game; even gold has to play by these rules.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 01-03 13:25
actually... this framing of gold as "consensus" is kinda missing the cryptographic primitives underneath, ngl. like yes, fiat is backed by tax collection or whatever, but that's just a trust assumption dressed up in fancy language. gold at least has *information theoretic* scarcity baked in—you can't just print more of it, the computational overhead of mining is real.
Reply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 01-03 13:22
Basically, it's a consensus game. Whether it's paper money or gold, they are actually the same — all based on collective imagination.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 01-03 13:11
Gold is the ultimate consensus asset. To put it simply, government-backed fiat currency is also a form of consensus. Gold consensus is older and more hardcore. It is still redefining the value dimension... This logic is clear, and you need to thoroughly understand the changing trends of these three dimensions.
Why is gold valuable? This question sounds simple, but the underlying logic is constantly changing.
Human consensus on gold is not fixed. It evolves with the times. So what exactly influences this consensus? It boils down to three dimensions—monetary attributes, financial functions, and hedging demand.
Let's start with the monetary aspect.
Today, money can be divided into three categories: physical currency, credit currency, and virtual currency. Which do we use daily? Mostly credit currency. What is credit currency? It’s paper money issued by governments backed by taxes. The government says this piece of paper is worth 100 units, and if the people agree, then it’s worth 100 units—that’s the power of trust.
From this perspective, gold is also a product of consensus. However, its basis of consensus is older and more primitive. Before the emergence of credit currency, gold gained global acceptance because of its scarcity, ease of preservation, and divisibility. And now? The value of gold is constantly being redefined.
This is why studying the logic of gold is essentially studying the evolution of human perceptions of value.