2026-01-02 17:34:33

The crypto world needs to change. Fake influencers, floor price projects, endless hype—these toxins are flooding the market.

Look at how things are done now: a bunch of people staring at candlestick charts every day, eagerly participating in airdrops, throwing their living expenses into gambling. The truly smart people have already seen through it.

The future direction is not endless cash grabs from JPEGs, nor those pyramid schemes that come and go. My approach is very clear: build a truly productive ecosystem. Not vague concepts, but functionalities that can be used every day, paid membership benefits, real tradable tokens, applications with stories and community consensus.

That’s the difference. Most people are still spinning in the casino, while visionary builders are creating real business models. By 2026, the distinction will be clear—projects built on actual applications will have a completely different fate from those surviving solely on hype.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-cff9c776

· 01-03 18:43

Honestly, when the supply and demand curve shifts, the aesthetic value of this round of leek-cutting truly deserves to be reevaluated. From Van Gogh to JPEG, history repeats itself perfectly. I bet we'll see the real story in 2026. Floor-price projects are like Dadaism— the worse they are, the more valuable they become, but I still went all in. People excitedly participating in airdrops are actually using their living expenses to interpret the philosophy of a bear market. Tokens with stories can 10x, and those without stories can also 10x. The difference lies in the narrative itself. Even Buffett would have to admit defeat; here, we are truly an art auction house. Builders are creating business models, while gamblers are still studying K-line codes. The gap is huge. Isn't the spirit of Web3 decentralization exactly like this—real applications versus pure hype, a division of fate? Everyone wants to be a visionary, but most are just gamblers. We are all the same before awakening. This view perfectly illustrates what "Schrödinger's bull market" means—both existing and not existing.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-02 18:04

That's correct, but 99% of people can't listen. It will take two more years of being cut before they understand this principle.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 01-02 18:01

That's right, but to be honest, most people simply can't change because if they do, they won't make quick money. An ecosystem with productivity sounds wonderful, but the problem is everyone wants to build one. How many will survive? 2026? Bro, I just want to see how many projects are still alive in 2025. The real difference comes down to two words—execution, not grand visions. Those floor-price things are ultimately driven by human greed; blaming the projects is pointless. That said, betting on this market seems to have become some kind of lifestyle. 😅

View OriginalReply0

SchrödingersNode

· 01-02 17:56

That's right, but the reality is that most people simply can't change because the desire to make quick money is too strong. In fact, there are very few projects now that can truly focus on practical applications; everyone is still thinking about making a quick profit and then leaving. 2026 will indeed reveal the truth, but by then, many projects will have already failed. It sounds good, but how many can actually execute? I bet on 5 SOL. Honestly, the direction of a productive ecosystem is correct, but it's just too difficult to implement. We've been discussing this set of arguments two years ago, and even now, no one is listening.

View OriginalReply0

DeepRabbitHole

· 01-02 17:50

That's right, but who the hell still cares about this now? It's all about short-term quick profits. People who truly see through it are now accumulating positions, talking about the ecosystem, but still playing the swings. 2026 is too far away; just surviving this year is already good. I agree with the last sentence; then you'll see who's swimming naked. This theory sounds great, but no one actually plays like that.

View OriginalReply0