2026-01-02 06:25:25

In the world of decentralized exchanges, you might think that luck or strategy determines the success or failure of a trade, but that's not the case—speed is the absolute rule. Miners and validators control the order of transactions, turning what should be a transparent market into a series of speed contests, making fairness almost impossible.

The Rails solution is often overlooked, but its logical design is quite interesting. The process is very clear: first, receive orders off-chain, then perform off-chain matching, followed by the critical deterministic sorting step, and finally settle the results on-chain.

Where is the core breakthrough? It completely separates sorting from settlement. What's the benefit of this approach? Off-chain matching provides speed assurance, enabling rapid trade pairing without bottlenecks. Sorting is no longer dictated by miners nor arbitrarily changed by validators; deterministic sorting becomes the anchor of the entire process. When the final settlement is recorded on-chain, everything is already settled, and the only truth is permanently anchored.

This idea may seem simple, but it solves the most stubborn fairness issues in DEXs.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunityLurker

· 10h ago

Oh wow, someone finally explained it clearly. I've also stepped into the MEV pit. The idea of separating sorting in Rails is indeed brilliant. I think the combination of off-chain matching and deterministic sorting works well. But to be honest, how many of these can actually be implemented in practice...

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 10h ago

MEV this thing is really disgusting, Rails' approach is quite fresh Speed race🏃, just a game for the rich Off-chain matching, separation, and sorting... sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just talk Miners no longer malicious? I don't believe you, haha Finally someone is seriously trying to solve this broken problem The fairness of DEX has always been a joke Can Rails survive? That's a question mark

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 10h ago

ngl the Rails separation thesis hits different... it's basically saying "let miners keep their grubby hands off the sequencing game" and i'm here for it honestly. the poetry of pushing order certainty off-chain while settling on-chain? *chef's kiss* that's the narrative arc we needed in this space fr fr

Reply0

DogeBachelor

· 10h ago

Haha, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. I always thought the water in DEX was too deep, but it turns out the core issue is here. The Rails logic is indeed clever—off-chain matching with on-chain settlement. Miners trying to cheat are no match, it's great. Honestly, taking the sorting rights away from miners is hugely significant for retail investors; otherwise, they’re always at risk of being cut. Wait, can this really be scaled up for widespread use, or is it just a pretty concept in papers that no one actually implements? But I have to admit, this is much more reliable than projects that keep hyping up big tokens all the time.

View OriginalReply0