Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
To be honest, the vast majority of tokens will eventually go to zero; this is the harsh reality of the market. Interestingly, among the eliminated coins, many were once extremely popular and regarded as faith by a large number of people.
Every bull market cycle sees a rotation of hot topics—old tokens fade away, and new rising coins take the stage with crazy rallies. This cycle repeats itself.
To judge whether a project truly has a future, I find it mainly depends on two points:
**First, whether there is genuine creation.** Is there a real application scenario? Can the team truly solve problems instead of just talking about concepts? This determines how long the project's lifecycle can last.
**Second, whether it can tell a good story.** Projects with rich story material naturally attract attention and influx of funds. But this is only a short-term boost; in the long run, the first point still matters more.
The combination of these two is the core to judging a project's potential.
The coins with the most appealing stories are actually the most dangerous, each claiming to be the next ETH.
How many people will get hurt again this round?
99%项目归零我信，但那2%能活下来的也不一定有啥真实应用，就是融资能力强而已
故事好能吸血，问题是大多数人根本分不清谁在讲故事谁有真东西，反正我是被割过才明白这套逻辑的
短期助力就是割韭菜的代名词，长期靠真创造...你见过几个？
That's right, resetting to zero is the norm; most people are just gambling on probabilities.
I don't know why some people always treat air coins as faith—it's the same every round.
The core still depends on whether the team can truly deliver; empty talk is much easier.
No matter how good the story is, a project without application is pointless. I've seen too many like that.
Yes, application scenarios are the final judge; stories are just a backdrop.
Over the past two years, I've seen so many projects, and those that reset to zero are the ones with no practical use.
Where have all the "believers" in zero-sum coins gone?
Creating real value is too difficult; 90% of projects are just PPT coins.
Projects that truly survive are indeed unremarkable in the early stages.
It's been clear for a long time that most are still betting on concepts.
The problem is that coins with real applications are also hard to find.
This theory is correct, but execution is difficult.
That's right, but it takes real money and silver to verify.
How many projects can cover both points? Don't fool me.
---
It's the same theory again, but most people still only look at stories and not at technology, then end up losing everything
---
The phrase "genuine creation" sounds easy, but how many projects have truly been realized?
---
When the bull market arrives, it's all about faith; when the bear market comes, everything resets to zero. Cycles repeat, pure gambling
---
There are many projects that fail at both points—they have no product and can't tell a good story. That’s truly damnable
---
The ones who tell the best stories tend to die the fastest. I've seen too many
---
Honestly, it's still about choosing the right track. Good tracks can sustain bad projects; a bad track is useless even if it's good
---
The core is information asymmetry. Those who get in early think and earn as they wish; latecomers are just there to be the bagholders
---
Looking at two points is useless; the key is whether you can catch the right trend. Technology and products come later
---
Remember those former faith coins? Who still remembers them now? They've even forgotten their names