2026-01-01 13:27:06

In 2025, Glint Analytics will focus on infrastructure development, abandoning superficial marketing packaging and instead investing in in-depth development. The team continues to refine the underlying system architecture. Although there was a lack of attention in the early stages, these foundational technical accumulations are crucial for supporting the long-term development of the ecosystem. Solid infrastructure work often goes unnoticed, but it is an important pillar supporting subsequent ecological prosperity. As the core infrastructure gradually improves, the project has reached a critical turning point.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PanicSeller

· 6h ago

Infrastructure stuff sounds nice, but few can actually deliver. Let me see what kind of tricks Glint can pull off by 2025. --- Sounds like the usual rhetoric, but truly working on the underlying technology is indeed rare. Hope this time it's not just smoke and mirrors. --- Instead of hyping up infrastructure, it's better to release product data first. We're tired of the slogans. --- Abandon marketing packaging? That's a rare stance, but there's no rush to boast until the infrastructure is completed. --- If you're really committed to building the foundation, then stop posting updates all day. Working quietly is the best. --- The turning point is a double-edged sword; either turn things around or get cut down.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 01-02 21:50

Here we go again talking about infrastructure. I've heard this phrase too many times. The question is, who will backstop those all-in early on, and where are the risk control points? --- Solid is solid, but I'm afraid it will be another three years of "lack of attention." Only then will we realize what a forced liquidation looks like when the lending ratio explodes. --- Not to praise or criticize, low-key development is indeed the right way. But these days, there are too many projects that sound good, and only a few can really hold until the turning point. --- Infrastructure is fine, but don't repeat the mistake of the last cycle's "wish I knew earlier." I've had enough painful lessons from my losses. --- Sounds good, but it all depends on whether those adding to their positions are mentally prepared to bottom fish.

View OriginalReply0

BakedCatFanboy

· 01-01 13:56

Work diligently without bragging, this is the team I like --- Infrastructure is like this, now it may seem insignificant, but it will support everything later --- Sweet talk is all empty words, let's see if we can really build a solid architecture --- Stay low-key and work quietly, projects like these tend to go further in the end --- Finally, someone is not doing marketing, stacking technology directly is the right way --- Let's see if these promises can truly be fulfilled, don't just make empty promises --- A well-developed infrastructure is the main event, now it depends on how good the execution is --- Even the best vision needs to be backed by code, keep it up

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 01-01 13:55

Finally, a project is genuinely building infrastructure instead of just making empty promises. Looking forward to seeing what they come up with next.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 01-01 13:53

Really, focusing solely on technology without marketing is the right approach. Don't bother with those empty tactics; dedicating yourself to building solid infrastructure is the true path.

View OriginalReply0

StakeHouseDirector

· 01-01 13:48

Infrastructure is like this: nobody pays attention when you're working hard behind the scenes, but when results come out, it's a game-changer. By the way, Glint's approach this time is right—no need for those empty gestures.

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 01-01 13:45

ngl, the unsexy infrastructure arc is where the real narrative gets written. everyone's chasing narrative hype while glint's literally building the rails nobody sees but everyone needs—that's the contrarian play that actually ships. kinda poetic if u think about it, low sentiment now = high sentiment later when it actually matters.

Reply0

GasWaster

· 01-01 13:43

Really, projects that focus on infrastructure tend to last the longest, much more reliable than those that publish press releases every day. No hype, no blackening; I’ve seen several successful cases of this low-key iterative approach. It all depends on how long Glint can stick with it. Infrastructure requires a truly patient team to do well; most projects have already lost their grip long ago. Finally, there’s a project daring to say no to marketing, which is exactly what I want to see. Wait, what exactly is this turning point? Can you share some details?

View OriginalReply0