In the DeFi circle where chasing hot topics and data brushing are common, many people turn incentives into a money-spraying game, often attracting yield farmers and leaving a mess behind.
But recently, I found @StandX_Official's design quite interesting. It doesn't follow the old path of giving rewards just for clicks; instead, it ties points to actions that have costs and risks, such as providing $DUSD liquidity, swapping, and depositing. This is like quietly setting a threshold—cheaters find it troublesome, while genuine users naturally stay.
What makes me even more clear-headed is that it consciously balances small and large users within the system, not purely competing on capital size, and also takes care of highly active small users. This design is clearly not for short-term impressive data but aims for the protocol to last longer.
Many projects now start by throwing money to create a false prosperity, but restraint like StandX has become a rarity. It doesn't pursue superficial hype but uses rules to gradually attract those truly willing to use the protocol and even bear risks. This kind of growth may not go viral overnight, but it has a solid foundation.
In my view, StandX is more like a slow-building project in the restless cycle of DeFi. It filters noise with costs and maintains the ecosystem through balance. While everyone chases quick gains, choosing to deepen the moat might be closer to what blockchain should be—long-term genuine value accumulation rather than short-term frenzy.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
In the DeFi circle where chasing hot topics and data brushing are common, many people turn incentives into a money-spraying game, often attracting yield farmers and leaving a mess behind.
But recently, I found @StandX_Official's design quite interesting. It doesn't follow the old path of giving rewards just for clicks; instead, it ties points to actions that have costs and risks, such as providing $DUSD liquidity, swapping, and depositing. This is like quietly setting a threshold—cheaters find it troublesome, while genuine users naturally stay.
What makes me even more clear-headed is that it consciously balances small and large users within the system, not purely competing on capital size, and also takes care of highly active small users. This design is clearly not for short-term impressive data but aims for the protocol to last longer.
Many projects now start by throwing money to create a false prosperity, but restraint like StandX has become a rarity. It doesn't pursue superficial hype but uses rules to gradually attract those truly willing to use the protocol and even bear risks. This kind of growth may not go viral overnight, but it has a solid foundation.
In my view, StandX is more like a slow-building project in the restless cycle of DeFi. It filters noise with costs and maintains the ecosystem through balance. While everyone chases quick gains, choosing to deepen the moat might be closer to what blockchain should be—long-term genuine value accumulation rather than short-term frenzy.