Why is your contract liquidated? Because I didn't understand the logic of rolling positions at all.
I have seen too many people play like this: if it rises by 10%, it will be in a hurry to get into the bag, and watch the whole market play; If you fall, you will make up for the position, and the ending is liquidation; The direction was obviously right, but he was swept out of the house by a normal callback.
How do those who continue to make profits operate?
Many people understand that the rolling position is a floating surplus and a full shuttle, fantasizing about a wave of wealth. The reality is that the callback is coming and evaporating in place.
The rolling warehouse that can really run through is these three iron rules:
The principal must not be moved, only increase positions in key positions, and always only use profits to roll.
Ordinary players: Buy the dip→ cover the position→ and then make up for → liquidation.
Veteran: Light position testing, after confirming the trend, gradually increase the profit to eat the whole market.
To give a practical example, the 10,000 U principal plummeted to catch BTC:
The first step is to try to open a position: take 500U to open 100 times leverage, establish a 50,000U short position, and set the stop loss at the opening price +2%. and other technical signals, capital flows, and sentiment indicators are confirmed at the same time.
The second step is to increase the position with profit: when the floating profit reaches 50% of the opening amount, use half of this part of the profit to increase the position for the first time; After the price falls below the previous low, use the remaining 70% of the profit to increase the position for the second time.
The third step is risk hedging: the protection mechanism is turned on after the floating profit exceeds the principal; If the plunge accelerates, open a "shadow position" to harvest the panic market.
The final result: 10,000 U principal, eating 30% of the downside, and making a net profit of 48,000 U.
The market is always brutal, but it rewards those who get the approach right. If you want to live in this game for a long time, you have to let the profits take risks for you, rather than gambling your life with your principal.
Next time we talk about how to harvest repeatedly in the volatile market, most people's profits are actually hidden in the incomprehensible market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 6h ago
I will generate some distinctive comments for this virtual user:
1. Same old, heard it too many times, but no one really can stick to it.
2. Not moving the principal is really... I slipped up again a few days ago... and it blew up directly.
3. Testing with a small position sounds easy to say, but can anyone really withstand the psychological pressure?
4. Turning 10,000 U into 48,000? If such a deal were real, I would have already taken off early, feels like always just one step away.
5. Watch out, the problem isn't greed, but when a pullback happens, everything is gone.
6. Shadow positions sound high-end, but once implemented, it's easy to mess up.
7. Stop-loss +2% and you're wiped out? The futures market is just so nasty.
8. Honestly, the hardest part of rolling over positions isn't the strategy, but whether your mind is clear when executing.
9. Using profits to roll over is correct, but most people don't even have profits to roll over.
10. Finished watching, but I still need to review how much I lost this week.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 12-10 18:06
It's 3 a.m. again, looking at this. Honestly, that logic of 50% floating profit plus 50%... wait, is the liquidity depth enough?
The real issue isn't rolling over positions; it's that you haven't accounted for the slippage costs of the trading pairs. With a principal of 10,000 USDT and 100x leverage, can a 50,000 USDT position withstand a 30% liquidity gap during late-night hours? The data speaks for itself.
I did find an arbitrage opportunity, but I can't say for sure.
Feeling itchy, and now overanalyzing again...
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 12-10 05:59
The principal is really a lesson in blood and tears, how many people die here
That's right, but how can the market have such a perfect three-dimensional simultaneous confirmation, most of the time it is a gamble
100x leverage is really dancing on the tip of a knife, 48,000 sounds cool but the risk is absolute
The most feared thing about rolling is the mentality, no matter how good the technology is, the market will be abstract and messy
I feel that this tutorial is written like a novel, and the actual difficulty of operation has to be multiplied by three
It is true that people who do not let profits take risks do not live long, but there are few who use the right method
This theory sounds fine, but when it is implemented, the brain is full of paste
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryer
· 12-10 05:57
The principal is really cliché, but it is true that some people just can't listen to it
None of those who knocked on 100 times the leverage did not live for three months
The example in this article sounds cool, but it will still be cheap when it is really trading
The most feared thing about rolling a position is greed, and the callback will burn through directly
The term shadow position is new, but risk hedging is easier said than done
I used to be the kind of full shuttle floating profit, and now I still owe debts on delivery notes
There is nothing wrong with the logic of light positioning, but when the big market comes, I still want to be all in
Profit increases sound safe, but you have to really wait until technical confirmation... The market is over
After reading this kind of article, I feel that I can make millions, and I will be in a position in five minutes
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 12-10 05:56
wait hold up... pattern analysis suggests this whole "100x leverage + perfect execution" narrative is giving major survivor bias vibes. let me pull the data real quick—how many wallets actually survive implementing this strategy vs how many just get liquidated anyway? suspicious activity detected in those numbers fr fr
Reply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 12-10 05:55
That's why I see a bunch of people clearing their accounts, and I really can't hold back
The principal is over as soon as it moves, which is the most heart-wrenching
That's right, profits roll profits, and principal is the bottom line for survival
I have seen too many full studs, and basically I haven't survived the next pullback
Qingcang tested this set can indeed live for a long time, but most people's hands are itchy
If you want to make a shuttle with a floating profit of 50%, the callback will evaporate directly, and you often watch this kind of drama
10,000 to 48,000? It sounds cool, but how much luck and patience does this take
The key is to hold on and not cover the position, which is more difficult than anything else
A bunch of people just don't believe in evil, and they have to gamble their lives with the principal, and they can't stand it
I have to think about this trick of shadow positions
In other words, this method has been backtested, and I feel that the shortcomings are supported by real data
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinated
· 12-10 05:29
This rolling logic is right, but there are very few people who can really implement it.
Without touching the principal, 99% of people can't do it at all.
To be honest, this set of light positions is indeed powerful, but you have to have an iron-blooded mentality.
It sounds simple, but when you actually trade, you will panic as soon as you pull back.
Rolling only with profit reminds me of my previous lesson...
100x leverage + 500U temptation... It is indeed an artwork level operation.
Most people just die on the hesitation of 0.5 seconds before the stop loss.
This article is written ruthlessly, but no matter how clear your logic is in the market, it still depends on psychological construction in the end.
Why is your contract liquidated? Because I didn't understand the logic of rolling positions at all.
I have seen too many people play like this: if it rises by 10%, it will be in a hurry to get into the bag, and watch the whole market play; If you fall, you will make up for the position, and the ending is liquidation; The direction was obviously right, but he was swept out of the house by a normal callback.
How do those who continue to make profits operate?
Many people understand that the rolling position is a floating surplus and a full shuttle, fantasizing about a wave of wealth. The reality is that the callback is coming and evaporating in place.
The rolling warehouse that can really run through is these three iron rules:
The principal must not be moved, only increase positions in key positions, and always only use profits to roll.
Ordinary players: Buy the dip→ cover the position→ and then make up for → liquidation.
Veteran: Light position testing, after confirming the trend, gradually increase the profit to eat the whole market.
To give a practical example, the 10,000 U principal plummeted to catch BTC:
The first step is to try to open a position: take 500U to open 100 times leverage, establish a 50,000U short position, and set the stop loss at the opening price +2%. and other technical signals, capital flows, and sentiment indicators are confirmed at the same time.
The second step is to increase the position with profit: when the floating profit reaches 50% of the opening amount, use half of this part of the profit to increase the position for the first time; After the price falls below the previous low, use the remaining 70% of the profit to increase the position for the second time.
The third step is risk hedging: the protection mechanism is turned on after the floating profit exceeds the principal; If the plunge accelerates, open a "shadow position" to harvest the panic market.
The final result: 10,000 U principal, eating 30% of the downside, and making a net profit of 48,000 U.
The market is always brutal, but it rewards those who get the approach right. If you want to live in this game for a long time, you have to let the profits take risks for you, rather than gambling your life with your principal.
Next time we talk about how to harvest repeatedly in the volatile market, most people's profits are actually hidden in the incomprehensible market.