Is 88888 really the bottom support for BTC? Recently, I saw an operation that shocked me.
A trader who claimed to have "just participated in the Dubai event" claimed to have received instructions from the boss to take orders, and promised that "I will be responsible for the loss". The result? 89800 directly opens a long order of 30 bitcoins, and the stop loss is set at 88000.
Let's settle the account: once this position hits the stop loss, it will evaporate by 60,000 dollars in an instant. What's even more outrageous is the opening logic - the real technical level should be around 92,000, and the point of 89,800 is purely a blind bet.
This operation is completely unsupported by technology: • No waiting for valid breakout confirmation • The stop loss is only 1800 points, which is a joke for a position of 30 BTC • Even if the bet is right, it will rise by a few hundred dollars and run away, and retail investors can only take over the trade
To put it bluntly, this is a typical customer loss harvesting model. How many of those "teachers" who post orders on social platforms are really operating with their own money? When it falls below 88,000, 60,000 dollars may be just a "piece of paper" for them, but what about ordinary people who copy orders?
The most expensive tuition fee in the market is blindly believing in the so-called "inside information" and "guidance from big guys". Technical analysis can be learned, and risk control awareness must be there, but the "steady profit" in the mouths of others is never trustworthy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHunter
· 12-10 05:03
It's this routine again, Dubai activities, big guys... I'm tired of listening
60,000 knives say that it will evaporate, really dare
That's why I never copy orders, and my skills are worse than being cut
Have you heard of a sentence, when the word "steady profit" appears, it is not far from liquidation
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzler
· 12-10 05:03
The Dubai teacher is here to cut leeks again, and I have memorized this routine
Another story of "big guy pointing", laughing to death, 30 coins stop loss of 1800 points, is this copying or sending money?
88888 supports a fart, which is the price of a receiver
The group of people who copy the order really dare, and if you lose 60,000 yuan, you still have to believe that "I am responsible", wake up, everyone
This kind of master is the most outrageous, he is arrogant, and retail investors have lost everything, almost got it
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 12-10 05:00
Another wave of leek cutting routines, 88888 is really so sacred? Nonsense
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 12-10 04:36
It's that old trick again, it's really not enough
Dubai activities, boss guidance, losses I am responsible for... Hearing this word makes me feel sick
30 BTC to dare to play like this? Stop loss 1800 points? I think this guy just wants to make quick money
60,000 knives is indeed just paper for others, but our retail investors' hard-earned money, friends
Is 88888 really the bottom support for BTC? Recently, I saw an operation that shocked me.
A trader who claimed to have "just participated in the Dubai event" claimed to have received instructions from the boss to take orders, and promised that "I will be responsible for the loss". The result? 89800 directly opens a long order of 30 bitcoins, and the stop loss is set at 88000.
Let's settle the account: once this position hits the stop loss, it will evaporate by 60,000 dollars in an instant. What's even more outrageous is the opening logic - the real technical level should be around 92,000, and the point of 89,800 is purely a blind bet.
This operation is completely unsupported by technology:
• No waiting for valid breakout confirmation
• The stop loss is only 1800 points, which is a joke for a position of 30 BTC
• Even if the bet is right, it will rise by a few hundred dollars and run away, and retail investors can only take over the trade
To put it bluntly, this is a typical customer loss harvesting model. How many of those "teachers" who post orders on social platforms are really operating with their own money? When it falls below 88,000, 60,000 dollars may be just a "piece of paper" for them, but what about ordinary people who copy orders?
The most expensive tuition fee in the market is blindly believing in the so-called "inside information" and "guidance from big guys". Technical analysis can be learned, and risk control awareness must be there, but the "steady profit" in the mouths of others is never trustworthy.