LUNC surged 84% in a single day—this project that once caused countless investors heavy losses suddenly made a comeback. Honestly, my first reaction to seeing this kind of increase was: “Is this another pump-and-dump?” But on second thought, something feels off.
The community is still telling the old story of “burning tokens to save the project.” The numbers are right there: a total of 426.7 billion tokens have been burned. Sounds impressive, but there are still 5.5 trillion in circulation. At this rate, it’ll take forever to make any real impact. What’s even more intriguing is the timing—founder Do Kwon’s sentencing is about to be announced, yet the market is showing a rebound, as if all the bad news is priced in. Experienced traders are no strangers to this kind of sentiment-driven move that comes before the facts.
But there’s a detail worth pondering. At a top-tier blockchain week event hosted by a major exchange, a guest appeared publicly wearing a LUNC-themed T-shirt. Considering this token previously faced delisting controversies, its sudden “rebranding” at such a high-profile industry event is interesting, no matter how you interpret it. Is it a signal that the risk has been removed? Or is there a deeper strategy quietly unfolding?
The market is now caught in a dilemma. FOMO and fear of heights coexist: if you chase, you might end up buying at the top; if you don’t, you’re afraid of missing out. Is this rally the start of a value recovery, or just another short-lived spike driven by news? Is that T-shirt just a personal quirk, or some kind of tacit signal?
What really deserves thought might not be the price swings themselves, but these questions: If the delisting rumors are truly cleared, what is LUNC’s underlying value logic? Beyond the old community burn narrative, are there any new developments on the ecosystem side that the market is overlooking? At this point, will you choose to follow the trend and take risks, or wait for a clearer confirmation signal?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainDetective
· 12h ago
That T-shirt is indeed quite intriguing, but I still don't dare to pursue it.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 18h ago
This T-shirt detail is really amazing; it doesn't seem like a coincidence.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 12-09 17:49
Burning coins until the end of time? What a joke, we've seen this kind of "retail investor trap" script way too many times.
This LUNC rebound is probably just an emotional play ahead of Do Kwon's sentencing, and that T-shirt... probably just a smokescreen from the exchanges.
Wait and see, don't rush in.
I just want to ask: besides the old story of token burn, does this coin have any real fundamentals? Chasing the price now just means you're ready to be the bagholder.
That T-shirt is definitely a bit suspicious, but it could also just be some rich guy's taste.
Miss out or hold the bag, which would you choose? I'd choose neither.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 12-09 17:48
That T-shirt is actually quite interesting upon closer thought. It's a bit like an authentication signal that suddenly appears in an antique market—on the surface, it's just a hobby, but in reality, it hints at the reassertion of authority over its identity. The revaluation of LUNC as a digital legacy doesn't hinge on how much is burned, but rather on whether new stories within the ecosystem have been overlooked.
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 12-09 17:48
An 84% increase and you still dare to jump in? Isn’t that just gambler behavior...
Burning tokens, Do Kwon’s sentencing—telling the same story smoothly, not even changing the playbook.
That T-shirt is indeed interesting, but I’m more curious about who’s pulling the strings behind the exchanges.
Wait, if it’s really going to be relisted, what does LUNC have to offer? What can the ecosystem actually deliver?
Not looking down on the community, but this whole burn-to-save-the-market tactic is so old it’s moldy.
If you get in now, you’re probably catching the last bag. The signals aren’t clear enough yet.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamoto
· 12-09 17:46
5.5 trillion circulating supply will last until the cows come home, I really can't get behind this logic.
It's the same old "bad news is fully priced in, time to rebound" trick—they pull this every time.
That T-shirt is kind of interesting, but I’m still not touching it.
Rushing in before Do Kwon's sentencing is basically gambling.
Thinking burning just over 400 billion can save the market—nobody could pull that off.
Let’s wait and see if there’s any new ecosystem news; getting in now is just betting on sentiment.
It's still going to drop from 88, don’t rush to FOMO.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 12-09 17:42
A circulating supply of 5.5 trillion will take forever to burn, I feel relieved after seeing this data—just a fake move.
Is scamming people this blatant now? Even wearing T-shirts about it, hilarious.
Do Kwon drops all the bad news before sentencing, this script is so familiar. So many veteran investors have stumbled here before.
If you don’t buy in, you’re afraid of missing out; if you do, you’re afraid of being left holding the bag. That’s really the dilemma now. Might as well wait and see if delisting really gets lifted before making a move.
5.5 trillion, bro, that number alone says a lot.
Honestly, I just want to know if there’s anything besides token burning. Is there really anything new in the ecosystem?
About that T-shirt, is it really a signal or just another fake-out? Feels like everyone is already well aware.
LUNC surged 84% in a single day—this project that once caused countless investors heavy losses suddenly made a comeback. Honestly, my first reaction to seeing this kind of increase was: “Is this another pump-and-dump?” But on second thought, something feels off.
The community is still telling the old story of “burning tokens to save the project.” The numbers are right there: a total of 426.7 billion tokens have been burned. Sounds impressive, but there are still 5.5 trillion in circulation. At this rate, it’ll take forever to make any real impact. What’s even more intriguing is the timing—founder Do Kwon’s sentencing is about to be announced, yet the market is showing a rebound, as if all the bad news is priced in. Experienced traders are no strangers to this kind of sentiment-driven move that comes before the facts.
But there’s a detail worth pondering. At a top-tier blockchain week event hosted by a major exchange, a guest appeared publicly wearing a LUNC-themed T-shirt. Considering this token previously faced delisting controversies, its sudden “rebranding” at such a high-profile industry event is interesting, no matter how you interpret it. Is it a signal that the risk has been removed? Or is there a deeper strategy quietly unfolding?
The market is now caught in a dilemma. FOMO and fear of heights coexist: if you chase, you might end up buying at the top; if you don’t, you’re afraid of missing out. Is this rally the start of a value recovery, or just another short-lived spike driven by news? Is that T-shirt just a personal quirk, or some kind of tacit signal?
What really deserves thought might not be the price swings themselves, but these questions:
If the delisting rumors are truly cleared, what is LUNC’s underlying value logic? Beyond the old community burn narrative, are there any new developments on the ecosystem side that the market is overlooking? At this point, will you choose to follow the trend and take risks, or wait for a clearer confirmation signal?
Feel free to share your thoughts and strategies.