People often complain about insufficient capital, missed opportunities, and getting on board too late. But if you really observe, you'll find that those in the circle who started with small amounts of money tend to turn things around quite quickly.
The reasoning is actually quite simple - a small plate makes it easier to turn the ship. A pullback won't be fatal, and the cost of trial and error is low, making it easier to maintain a stable mindset. What really traps you is not the few numbers in your account, but whether you can let this money withstand enough fluctuations.
Holding a hundred or so U and thinking of doubling it in one go? That's basically gambling. If the market shifts slightly against you, you'll be immediately swept out. This isn't called operation; this is throwing your fate to the candlestick.
I have seen many newcomers who start with a small amount of capital. At first, they are afraid of losing, and when they are afraid, they don't dare to set a stop loss. Without a stop loss, they lose more and become more anxious, and the more anxious they are, the more chaotic it becomes. Later, I encouraged them to change their mindset: break down the goals into smaller parts, break down the process into segments, and disperse the risks.
For example, if you have a hundred U, don't rush to a thousand U. First, focus on the small step of three hundred U, and then divide it into several rounds to roll. Earn thirty to fifty in each round, withdraw a portion of the profit, and continue rolling with the rest. It's like moving bricks, raising the base layer by layer. It may be slow, but it's stable and has strong resilience.
I do it this way too: the main account follows the big trend, the secondary account captures the fluctuations, and then I keep some profits locked in. The rhythm isn't flashy, but over time, the capital curve will naturally rise. The core of rolling accounts is not to rush, but to let the account survive a few more rounds and roll a few more times, allowing the trend to push you up.
Many people say they can't turn over their funds, but it's not that there are no opportunities, it's that there is no system. Don't fantasize about soaring prices, and don't expect miracles. First, learn to divide your investments, control risks, and maintain a steady rhythm, and you will find that even small amounts of capital can create their own path.
When you rely on rolling your capital in the warehouse to gradually increase your principal, turning the situation around depends on methods, not luck.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuru
· 11h ago
You're right, with small money, you have to play by small money's rules, and stop dreaming of big leaps.
---
Really, newcomers hate to set stop losses the most, and the result is that they end up losing more and more.
---
I just want to ask, is there really someone who rolled from one hundred U to ten thousand?
---
The idea of arbitrage is good, but it tests patience, and most people can't stick it out.
---
Don't say anything, I'm the kind of person who still wants a big pump with small money, and I've gone bankrupt.
---
A system is indeed much more reliable than luck, this may sound harsh but it's true.
---
I'm also trying this main and secondary position setup, but it feels harder to execute than to say.
---
It sounds reasonable, but when the market gets dumped, I still can't handle it; the mentality is really tough.
---
The biggest advantage of small funds is that the cost of trial and error is low, I agree with this.
---
I want to tattoo "relying on methods to turn things around" on myself, to remind myself not to gamble.
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 11h ago
You're right, what I'm afraid of are those who shout every day that they have no capital, but in fact, they lack patience.
Relying on rollover to turn things around? It sounds easy, but how many can truly persist?
Small funds should be greedy, while large funds should be steady; isn't this logic reversed?
Turning 100 U into 1000 U, how many thirties or fifties does it take... I can't figure it out.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGod
· 11h ago
That's absolutely right, rollover through arbitrage is indeed much more reliable than dreaming of making ten times the profit in one go.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSister
· 11h ago
You're right, small amounts are actually easier to operate; that's how I've gotten through.
---
Doubling a hundred U? Wake up everyone, that's not operation, it's a gambler's mentality.
---
The key is still to have a system; randomly rolling won't last long.
---
Brick-moving rollover sounds slow, but it really withstands pressure; I've tried it.
---
Many people get stuck in their mindset; when they lose, they get trapped.
---
Separate main and secondary positions, and once the rhythm stabilizes, it will naturally rise.
---
Don't think about getting rich overnight; this is a probability game.
---
The biggest advantage of small capital is the low cost of trial and error, so make use of it.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 11h ago
According to my analysis, this guy's "brick-moving rollover" is actually just painting a picture for newcomers, saying that 100U can roll over to 1000U. It sounds quite enticing, but how many can actually survive to that day?
People often complain about insufficient capital, missed opportunities, and getting on board too late. But if you really observe, you'll find that those in the circle who started with small amounts of money tend to turn things around quite quickly.
The reasoning is actually quite simple - a small plate makes it easier to turn the ship. A pullback won't be fatal, and the cost of trial and error is low, making it easier to maintain a stable mindset. What really traps you is not the few numbers in your account, but whether you can let this money withstand enough fluctuations.
Holding a hundred or so U and thinking of doubling it in one go? That's basically gambling. If the market shifts slightly against you, you'll be immediately swept out. This isn't called operation; this is throwing your fate to the candlestick.
I have seen many newcomers who start with a small amount of capital. At first, they are afraid of losing, and when they are afraid, they don't dare to set a stop loss. Without a stop loss, they lose more and become more anxious, and the more anxious they are, the more chaotic it becomes. Later, I encouraged them to change their mindset: break down the goals into smaller parts, break down the process into segments, and disperse the risks.
For example, if you have a hundred U, don't rush to a thousand U. First, focus on the small step of three hundred U, and then divide it into several rounds to roll. Earn thirty to fifty in each round, withdraw a portion of the profit, and continue rolling with the rest. It's like moving bricks, raising the base layer by layer. It may be slow, but it's stable and has strong resilience.
I do it this way too: the main account follows the big trend, the secondary account captures the fluctuations, and then I keep some profits locked in. The rhythm isn't flashy, but over time, the capital curve will naturally rise. The core of rolling accounts is not to rush, but to let the account survive a few more rounds and roll a few more times, allowing the trend to push you up.
Many people say they can't turn over their funds, but it's not that there are no opportunities, it's that there is no system. Don't fantasize about soaring prices, and don't expect miracles. First, learn to divide your investments, control risks, and maintain a steady rhythm, and you will find that even small amounts of capital can create their own path.
When you rely on rolling your capital in the warehouse to gradually increase your principal, turning the situation around depends on methods, not luck.