Not every platform maintains equal long-short ratios, and many have built-in safety nets through insurance funds.



Take decentralized perp protocols as examples: on GMX, trader profits and losses flow directly into the GLP liquidity pool. Similarly, Hyperliquid routes PnL through its HLP mechanism. This design means liquidity providers essentially act as the counterparty, absorbing the trading outcomes instead of relying solely on opposing positions to balance the books. It's a fundamentally different risk model compared to traditional orderbook exchanges.
GMX-0,52%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
zkProofGremlinvip
· 2025-11-24 10:30
The GLP taker is really fierce, but in this trap model, LP has become the counterparty... the risks are not small either.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000vip
· 2025-11-23 16:07
The design of directly consuming pnl with glp is really amazing; the LPs have become permanent counterparties... It feels completely different from traditional exchanges.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermitvip
· 2025-11-21 10:57
The logic that GLP absorbs traders' losses makes it sound like LPs are just suckers... But on the other hand, this kind of design actually spreads out the risk a lot more.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancakevip
· 2025-11-21 10:56
The GLP model is basically treating LPs as cash machines—when there's profit, LPs lose out; when there's a loss, everyone takes the hit together... This model sounds nice in theory, but in reality, it's just another way to fleece retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin