Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
VCCI exposes RISKS when "criminalizing" digital assets without legal basis ❤️🔥
Proposals to "criminalize" digital currency transactions and digital assets in Vietnam are generating many conflicting debates between regulatory agencies and the business community.
In the draft amendments to the Criminal Code, the Ministry of Public Security proposes to add regulations allowing the confiscation of new types of assets such as cryptocurrencies, electronic wallets, virtual assets, or property rights in digital environments. The goal is to more effectively address crimes like fraud, money laundering, or concealing cash flows through blockchain — issues that are increasingly complex and difficult to trace.
However, VCCI issues a notable warning: "criminalizing" too early while the legal framework is not yet complete could pose significant risks.
Currently, although there is an initial definition of "digital assets," Vietnam still lacks a clear regulatory system to distinguish between legal activities and violations in this field.
This could cause fintech companies, trading platforms, and even investors to inadvertently fall into legal risk zones.
Another issue emphasized by VCCI is that the description of violations in the draft remains quite general, without specific details on severity, consequences, or clear criteria. If applied in practice, this could lead to arbitrary interpretations and unnecessary pressure on the market.
From international experience, many countries like Singapore, Japan, or the EU tend to adopt a more cautious approach: first building a legal framework for regulation (including licensing, registration, or sandbox testing), then moving on to criminal sanctions for clearly defined violations.
#coinminutes