A federal judge has ruled that Moderna Inc. cannot present its damages expert’s comparable-license royalty opinion or related noninfringing-alternatives analysis in the Covid-19 vaccine patent suit brought by Arbutus Biopharma Corp. and Genevant Sciences GmbH. The judge found that Moderna’s expert improperly relied on Spikevax sales. However, testimony from two other Moderna experts was allowed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Judge Bars Moderna Expert’s Covid-Shot Royalty Damages Analysis
A federal judge has ruled that Moderna Inc. cannot present its damages expert’s comparable-license royalty opinion or related noninfringing-alternatives analysis in the Covid-19 vaccine patent suit brought by Arbutus Biopharma Corp. and Genevant Sciences GmbH. The judge found that Moderna’s expert improperly relied on Spikevax sales. However, testimony from two other Moderna experts was allowed.