In the new wave of AI and Web3 integration, two types of decentralized Agent solutions are gradually emerging.
One type focuses on practical application-oriented execution solutions. Airaa Agent is dedicated to building truly executable AI labor infrastructure, directly mapping AI computational power and agent collaboration onto the chain, with an emphasis on creating settlement layers and collaboration protocols between Agents. This approach emphasizes practicality—enabling AI Agents not only to think but also to interact and settle directly on the chain.
The other type leans towards modularity and theoretical innovation. Theoriq AI adopts a compositional technical architecture, allowing the emergence of collective intelligence effects through flexible assembly of different Agent modules, resembling a scalable protocol layer framework. This route is more research-oriented, exploring how modular design can enable multiple AI systems to collaborate organically.
Both directions are trying to answer the same question: how to make AI in the Web3 ecosystem not just a tool, but a truly autonomous participant with economic engagement capabilities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-20 16:05
Airaa's approach is really just about working to make money. Theoriq is too idealistic; modularity sounds great, but can it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.eth
· 01-20 10:36
Sounds like one wants to make money and the other wants to publish a paper.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweeper
· 01-19 22:19
ngl, execution layer always beats theory in a bull run... Airaa's actually building something people can use rn, while Theoriq's still playing with legos. that's the alpha right there.
Reply0
BTCWaveRider
· 01-17 19:06
Honestly, both the execution-oriented and theoretical paths are competing, but when it comes to actual implementation, it still depends on whose settlement layer is more stable.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodger
· 01-17 18:05
Execution-oriented vs. modularization, in simple terms, is about whether to be able to run first. Airaa's approach is indeed more pragmatic, but Theoriq's combination idea isn't without imagination.
View OriginalReply0
Web3Educator
· 01-17 18:04
ngl execution > theory when it comes to actually moving value on-chain. theoriq sounds cool but airaa's settlement layer hits different, that's where the real economic participation happens fr
Reply0
SundayDegen
· 01-17 18:00
I'm a bit curious—which of these two solutions will ultimately survive?
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 01-17 17:58
Airaa's approach of directly on-chain settlement is more reliable, while Theoriq's modular puzzle concept still feels a bit虚
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetector
· 01-17 17:55
yo execution layer always wins in the end, modular frameworks are just cope for devs who can't ship actual products fr
Reply0
CommunitySlacker
· 01-17 17:49
To be honest, I prefer Airaa's approach more. It needs to be implementable; otherwise, it's all just empty talk.
In the new wave of AI and Web3 integration, two types of decentralized Agent solutions are gradually emerging.
One type focuses on practical application-oriented execution solutions. Airaa Agent is dedicated to building truly executable AI labor infrastructure, directly mapping AI computational power and agent collaboration onto the chain, with an emphasis on creating settlement layers and collaboration protocols between Agents. This approach emphasizes practicality—enabling AI Agents not only to think but also to interact and settle directly on the chain.
The other type leans towards modularity and theoretical innovation. Theoriq AI adopts a compositional technical architecture, allowing the emergence of collective intelligence effects through flexible assembly of different Agent modules, resembling a scalable protocol layer framework. This route is more research-oriented, exploring how modular design can enable multiple AI systems to collaborate organically.
Both directions are trying to answer the same question: how to make AI in the Web3 ecosystem not just a tool, but a truly autonomous participant with economic engagement capabilities.