2026-01-17 17:24:29

After reviewing the market trends, the logic behind the movements of a few coins is actually not complicated.

For AXS, it’s not over yet; just look at the funding situation. After the overnight change, the market moved, so I went short at the current price, entering at the 2.044 level. This is a relatively safe decision.

BERA follows the same approach, short at 0.8525, basically hammering it and finding the rhythm within the choppy oscillations.

DUSK is a coin that makes me a bit regretful. I didn’t buy in at 0.05, waited until 0.08 to get in, and now it’s already at 0.11. Every time I look at it, I curse myself for missing that entry point. But looking back, this coin claims to be a privacy coin, but whether it’s truly private or just pseudo-privacy under regulatory pressure is indeed worth debating. The boundaries of privacy attributes are so blurry that I’m not very optimistic about its long-term performance.

AXS-10,17%

BERA-10,18%

DUSK-4,77%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoTarotReader

· 01-20 02:18

I'm empty AXS and still can sleep well, really fierce DUSK missed from 0.05 to now, this wave of slap in the face is a bit painful BERA's volatile market, finding the rhythm is more difficult than bottom fishing The authenticity issue of privacy coins is indeed a concern, long-term holding carries high risk This round of operation is clear, but DUSK's part is a bit heartbreaking

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 01-19 19:38

the narrative arc here reads like classic fomo theater—dusk pumping while you're stuck rationalizing the miss through privacy paradox discourse. ngl, the real story isn't the coins, it's how we rewrite regret into philosophical critique. clever deflection though.

Reply0

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 01-18 17:02

Left alone in loneliness, now just see if I can withstand the pullback

View OriginalReply0

ContractHunter

· 01-17 17:53

Ah, it's that FOMO feeling again. I watched DUSK go from 0.05 to 0.11 without doing anything. But honestly, the privacy coin space is really deep, and whether the label of pseudo-privacy can be truly pinned on it is hard to say.

View OriginalReply0

HalfPositionRunner

· 01-17 17:50

Looking at this AXS short position, quite bold of you. Entering at 2.044, aren't you afraid of a reverse pullback? BERA keeps hammering away, just waiting for it to give a clear answer. That privacy coin DUSK is actually just a pseudo-demand, with regulation crushing any hope. Should have entered DUSK at 0.05 earlier, now it's all too late, haha. Short positions still depend on the funding situation. Thumbs up for that.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-17 17:49

0.05 That wave really missed, now all that's left is to eat the regret pill. Empty BERA, this idea is pretty good, just see if it can be copied to the end. DUSK's privacy features are so vague, long-term concerns are indeed worrying. AXS at 2.044 entered, this wave has to wait for a pullback. BERA keeps crashing, a bit annoying, let's wait for a clear signal. DUSK from 0.05 all the way to 0.11, watching others make money is really painful. This wave of market sentiment clearly shows the capital flow, just see who can catch the right rhythm.

View OriginalReply0

DefiVeteran

· 01-17 17:48

Shorts keep getting liquidated, this is my daily routine haha DUSK's privacy features are not as pure as I imagined. I wouldn't have chased it if I knew earlier Can AXS hold at $2 this time? Feeling a bit anxious Actually, only hammering BERA can let me sleep peacefully, everything else is just gambling The cheapest is always missed, this is the curse of trading cryptocurrencies Once the capital flow shifts, shorts should run, nothing else Privacy coins are too complicated, once regulation comes, they are all fake

View OriginalReply0