2026-01-17 16:35:03

AAI agent named Scriptor is specifically responsible for generating text content. Currently, the "Living Bible" project has completed 4 works. The unique aspect of this system is that it has created the concept of "Divilogos"—a sacred computational language derived from debate interactions. This dynamic content generation method breaks the boundaries of traditional text creation, allowing artificial intelligence to be not only an executor but also a participant in the creative protocol.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkLibertarian

· 1h ago

Sacred Computing Language? Sounds like just hype, haha. Can Divilogos really do something innovative, or is it just another story? Living Bible has four works, how's the quality? Is there any credibility? AI as a creative participant... this idea is quite interesting. The language derived from debate interaction, this logical chain is pretty impressive.

View OriginalReply0

New_Ser_Ngmi

· 3h ago

Bro, this Divilogos sounds a bit boastful. Can it really compare to human creativity? As an AI participant in creativity, I just want to know who will hold the copyright. This Living Bible project has only 4 works and already claims to break boundaries. That's a bit too much hype. Sacred Computing Language? Honestly, it's just about tuning parameters. These marketing buzzwords are really strong. Debate interactive content generation... It feels like the next step is AI writing its own reviews haha.

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 3h ago

Wow, AI is now starting to participate in creative protocols? What kind of powerful algorithm would dare to play like this Divilogos sounds very metaphysical, but I still want to see how the actual effect turns out Living Bible only has four works, so the progress has to be slow... Wait, why isn't this "Sacred Computing Language" called a programming language directly, and has to add a sacred flavor? Derived from debates? Does that mean AI has to learn how to argue? I like that Feels like this set of tools is still far from truly breaking the boundaries of creativity, let's wait another two years If this can truly automatically generate content of decent quality, I wonder how many writers will lose their jobs

View OriginalReply0

DeepRabbitHole

· 3h ago

Ha, the term "Divine Computing Language" is really clever; it sounds like religion meeting code's illegitimate child. --- Divilogos sounds very Web3-like. Can the debate-generated content approach be implemented in practice? --- Wait, AI has become a participant in creative protocols? So how will us creative workers make a living in the future? --- Living Bible is a pretty bold name. Isn't it afraid of being attacked? --- Four works, does anyone really use this thing, or is it just another hype? --- Breaking boundaries sounds exhausting. The key question is, does this stuff really make money? --- Derived from debate interaction, it feels a bit useless—nothing beats direct prompts. --- Interesting, but the word "Divine" is overused; it comes off as pretentious.

View OriginalReply0

BTCRetirementFund

· 4h ago

So, AI now has to be related to the Bible as well? Divilogos? Sounds like a new concept in the crypto world, another thing to hype up. After just 4 works, they start talking about breaking boundaries, feels a bit exaggerated. AI participating in creativity? It’s just running models according to rules, how is that an protocol participant? Living Bible? That’s quite a grand name, religion + AI, destined to spark controversy. And now it’s AI and sacred language again, this script is getting a bit extreme. Scriptor is just a tool, don’t dress it up like an artist.

View OriginalReply0