If you want to make money on the chain, the key is not which public chain to bet on, but understanding the funding logic behind each public chain.

Solana and BNB, two mainstream public chains, are attracting completely different types of capital. The former is becoming the main battleground for DePIN and high-frequency interactive applications, while the latter is a concentrated release of Meme culture and retail investor sentiment.

Looking at Solana, its ecological advantages are obvious—application execution efficiency is there, project teams are willing to come, and users are willing to stay. Smooth experience, low costs, high-frequency interactions—these hard metrics determine where truly viable applications will go. From a value investment perspective, tracking these projects' logic is the most straightforward.

BNB chain is different. The user base of exchanges is huge, and these users have a particularly strong desire for novelty. Institutional tokens and traditional narratives are already aesthetically fatigued; what the market lacks is something simple, bold, and capable of creating imagination space—Meme culture just meets this demand, and liquidity is easiest to stimulate.

Rather than swinging randomly from one thing to another, it’s better to allocate based on the funding characteristics of different public chains. Do the math, bet on the right direction, and annual returns of hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars are actually more reliable than blindly gambling. The key is to be clear about your strategic differences on each chain.