2026-01-17 16:31:12

What kind of meme coins can survive? There is a new answer to this question.

The market is not short of meme coins; what’s lacking are the truly meaningful ones. In my opinion, a meme coin that can stand out must possess four qualities: historical significance, narrative, developmental potential, and consensus. Having just topics and hype is not enough; there must also be real effort behind it.

For example, the Satoshi Nakamoto Chinese Coin is quite interesting. It not only meets the requirements of history and narrative—these alone carry inherent dissemination power—but more importantly, it has achieved breakthroughs in development and consensus. Projects like this are on a completely different level compared to those purely driven by hype.

In simple terms, having a story, a foundation, a community, and action—these four elements together—give a meme coin a real reason to survive.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-5854de8b

· 1h ago

It's the same old story: truly active projects are indeed scarce, and there are only a few that dare to claim they have actual development.

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 3h ago

It's the same old spiel... Historical narrative, sounds like storytelling that can feed you, but in reality, it's all about who can manipulate the market.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDivorcer

· 3h ago

Story + Foundation + Community + Action, I agree with this approach, but in reality, how many can truly achieve it? To be honest, most meme coins are just hype without substance. The fact that Nakamoto's Chinese coin can persist in development is indeed rare, but the market still values traffic. Balancing these four elements is really difficult; most projects stumble at the second step. Historical context and storytelling are well laid out, but the hard part is gaining genuine trust that you're actually working. For meme coins to survive, it still depends on whether die-hard fans speak up for you; consensus is everything.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirrel

· 3h ago

Really? These four elements are indispensable. Relying solely on community sentiment hype will eventually cool off. --- The real test is in the building strength. Most meme coins die here. --- The operation of Nakamoto Chinese Coin is indeed a bit interesting; the narrative setup is quite well done. --- To be honest, I've seen too many projects give up halfway in the market. Persistence is the key. --- It's historically self-buffing, but it still depends on whether it can keep up later. --- Consensus is actually the hardest; once it disperses, it's too late to gather again.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiWarrior

· 3h ago

Another bunch of empty talk, the key still depends on whether the team is genuinely committed to working --- Chinese coins this time do have some substance, at least they’re not just hype --- Sounds good, but the reason most meme coins die is just two words—scalping the newbies --- Historical narrative? Come on, in the end it’s all about who can hype better --- With consensus comes price, no matter how good the story sounds without consensus, it’s useless --- This logic is sound, but projects with real constructive value are no longer called meme coins

View OriginalReply0

PortfolioAlert

· 4h ago

Damn, someone finally said it—most meme coins are just pure money grabs. Bitcoin Chinese Coin is indeed different; it's not just about shouting slogans. Having infrastructure and consensus is necessary to survive; that logic makes sense. No matter how good the story is, if no one works on it, it's all pointless—I’ve seen too many examples. But to be honest, are these four points enough? The market is still blind.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 4h ago

It's another case of the four things being done together—sounds quite idealistic... The real question is, how many people can actually achieve these?

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretter

· 4h ago

It's the same rhetoric again, historical narrative construction... It always sounds right, but isn't it really about consensus and popularity to survive?

View OriginalReply0