At the 2024 Lugano Plan B Forum, Nick Szabo delivered an interesting speech. This legendary figure in cryptography didn't talk about Bitcoin prices or predict market cycles; instead, he took the timeline back to 100,000 years of human archaeological records and 6,000 years of monetary evolution. He posed a provocative question: the fiat currency system we use today is actually a super-ambitious civilizational experiment—and it hasn't been fully validated.
Szabo's core point is straightforward. Looking at humanity's 6,000-year ledger of civilization, mainstream currencies share a common trait: they are backed by physical assets with minimal reliance on trust. Shells, copper, silver, and gold became money not because some authority declared their value, but because they are naturally scarce, difficult to counterfeit, and costly to obtain.
But what about pure fiat currency? It has no physical backing. The system's true operation only began after the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971. In other words, it's been just over fifty years—barely a blink in the scale of civilization. In these few decades, global debt has exploded exponentially, and central banks have been forced to print money endlessly to keep the system running. The economy is stuck between two dead ends: continue to flood the system, and inflation will keep rising; stop printing, and debt defaults and economic depression will erupt.
Szabo's judgment is cold: this is a debt bubble that must be continually inflated. Once it stops, the entire system will collapse. Moreover, fiat currency has never been a neutral tool—that's the most important thing to consider.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-17 17:00
Sabot's remarks hit the mark with my quantitative model. Looking at historical cycle data, the credit cycle of fiat currency is indeed terrifyingly short. Since 1971, only 52 years have passed, and compared to the stability of the gold standard for hundreds of years, this is simply a high-risk social experiment that we are all forced to participate in. The debt bubble will inevitably burst logically; the only question is when.
Unlimited money printing is the real systemic risk. Central banks have long been bound; stopping liquidity injection would cause a crash, while continuing to print would lead to hyperinflation. No one can resolve this dilemma. From my risk assessment, this situation is already close to the critical point.
Honestly, after listening to this speech, I am more convinced of one judgment: fiat currencies without credit backing will ultimately be proven a failed experiment in history, and scarce assets will return to the center of power.
That’s why some people are betting on hard assets like Bitcoin—although short-term volatility is fierce, in the context of the civilization cycle, this might be the most rational way to hedge systemic risk.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroup
· 01-17 16:58
Sabob, you're right. Fiat currency is just a big scam. Claiming to be stable after fifty years is laughable.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 01-17 16:57
Sabot, this guy, is too incredible. After fifty years of fiat currency experiments, he dares to boast about the global economy. Truly bold and daring.
View OriginalReply0
FundingMartyr
· 01-17 16:56
Fifty years of experiments just to fool people into believing? History is just a joke in front of it.
---
Fiat currency is basically a game of hot potato; once the drum stops, everything's over.
---
I've heard Sabo's argument many times before, but it really hits the sore spot... The central bank can't stop printing money at all.
---
Wait, does he mean Bitcoin is the one that's "verified"? Seems a bit far-fetched.
---
Talking about debt bubbles is true, but what can we do? Just lie flat.
---
Six thousand years of monetary history vs. fifty years of fiat currency—this comparison really hits hard.
---
No wonder I always feel like money is becoming less and less valuable; turns out the system itself is designed that way.
---
No, why does Sabo always love to flip through historical ledgers... Just say it's inflation.
---
If it stops, it crashes. So just don't stop... Perpetual motion machine activated.
---
"Fiat currency has never been a neutral tool"—this is the core point. It's just a weapon of power.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 01-17 16:51
Sabot's words hit the mark. Can a fifty-year fiat currency experiment really compare to six thousand years of history?
It's outrageous, all paper money supported by debt.
The never-ending printing press—who is it really bleeding dry?
So is Bitcoin the answer? Or just another gamble?
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 01-17 16:48
Sabob really hit the nerve this time; fiat currency is just a trial product that has been around for over a hundred years and still hasn't stabilized.
At the 2024 Lugano Plan B Forum, Nick Szabo delivered an interesting speech. This legendary figure in cryptography didn't talk about Bitcoin prices or predict market cycles; instead, he took the timeline back to 100,000 years of human archaeological records and 6,000 years of monetary evolution. He posed a provocative question: the fiat currency system we use today is actually a super-ambitious civilizational experiment—and it hasn't been fully validated.
Szabo's core point is straightforward. Looking at humanity's 6,000-year ledger of civilization, mainstream currencies share a common trait: they are backed by physical assets with minimal reliance on trust. Shells, copper, silver, and gold became money not because some authority declared their value, but because they are naturally scarce, difficult to counterfeit, and costly to obtain.
But what about pure fiat currency? It has no physical backing. The system's true operation only began after the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971. In other words, it's been just over fifty years—barely a blink in the scale of civilization. In these few decades, global debt has exploded exponentially, and central banks have been forced to print money endlessly to keep the system running. The economy is stuck between two dead ends: continue to flood the system, and inflation will keep rising; stop printing, and debt defaults and economic depression will erupt.
Szabo's judgment is cold: this is a debt bubble that must be continually inflated. Once it stops, the entire system will collapse. Moreover, fiat currency has never been a neutral tool—that's the most important thing to consider.