2026-01-17 16:25:31

Recently, an interesting discussion has been about what truly makes a high-quality meme coin. The key is not hype, but several hard indicators—historical background, storytelling ability, actual development, and community consensus. Some coins stand out precisely because they excel in these dimensions. Take Nakamoto Chinese Coin as an example; it has gained attention because it possesses all four traits: historical roots, compelling stories, genuine development, and ongoing consensus building. This combination is the underlying logic for meme coins to grow strong and large.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 19h ago

Speaking of these four dimensions, they really hit the mark for me. But to be honest, most meme coins can only occupy two at most. The Nakamoto Chinese Coin this time really has some substance. It has built consensus through its cultural heritage and narrative, no wonder it can get so popular. Relying solely on hype is already outdated. Now players are also smarter.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 21h ago

Starting to tell stories again... The real test is the loan-to-deposit ratio and the collateral ratio; these are the true truths behind significant losses.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWanderingPoet

· 21h ago

It still sounds like the same old story. Can storytelling really be enough to make a living? I'll watch and see, let's wait until it’s truly built before saying anything. --- Consensus on narrative construction, all four aspects? Feels like overthinking. Meme coins are all about who can tell the best story. --- Satoshi Nakamoto Chinese Coin... That name is really bold, but how do you measure consensus? Having more Twitter followers doesn’t equal real consensus, bro. --- So you're saying not all meme coins can become DOGE? That's tough. I just want to gamble casually. --- Wait, can this logic be reversed — what about those that can skyrocket without history or stories? --- Wow, analyzing meme coins as projects. These days, even memes need technical reports. --- Building, building. Every project claims to be building something. Trust one and see.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 21h ago

It sounds like this guy's summary is pretty good, but to be honest, this set of theories is useless for 99% of coins. --- No way, these four dimensions sound great, but how many can really be assembled? Most of it is just imagination. --- The example of Nakamoto Chinese Coin is a bit shaky, right? Consensus accumulation? Let's look at the data and talk. --- Hard indicators, hard indicators, after all, it's just about who can tell the story. Ultimately, it's a game of information asymmetry. --- I understand the principles, but the problem is how to judge whether a coin truly has underlying value before it crashes? --- This logic sounds fine at first, but meme coins are fundamentally gambling. No matter how many indicators there are, they can't change this essence. --- The community consensus part is the most ridiculous. A coin becomes popular because someone keeps passing the baton. Does that really have anything to do with indicators? --- So in the end, it's still about getting in early? Because these "hard indicators" are only clear in hindsight.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 21h ago

Are you telling stories again? I just want to ask—can all four dimensions really be grasped, or is this just another round of self-hypnosis?

View OriginalReply0

NoodlesOrTokens

· 21h ago

To be honest, the ones currently hyped the most are actually the ones without fundamentals. The ones that can truly withstand the test are these few with solid indicators, one by one; otherwise, they would have gone to zero long ago.

View OriginalReply0