I recently acquired a newly launched project, with a cost of 40,000, and I am currently holding it at a loss. This is a personal trading record; sharing it is not a recommendation, just to document the thought process at the time.
Why did I initially like this project? There are a few main reasons.
First is time sensitivity. This is a new project launched just a few minutes ago, and at that time, on-chain capital flow was very active, with high trading enthusiasm. During such a window, participants are generally early followers who are optimistic about this type of project.
Second is the price dimension. 40,000 is not a high price, and from a technical perspective, there is relatively ample room for growth upward. Many times, new projects attract incremental funds through such low prices.
Another factor is the market structure. At that time, the first wave of internal capital had basically been exhausted, and the market was beginning to see if new major funds could be introduced. I noticed that some projects that performed well before were also gathering momentum at this stage, which usually indicates that a second wave of market movement might be brewing.
There is also a detail about the project's symbolism. 2026 is the Year of the Horse, and the project's name and meaning both point to "wealth," which can psychologically appeal to retail investors.
However, looking back now, this trade serves as a reminder — even if the fundamentals, timing, and psychology all seem favorable for the project, market uncertainty still far exceeds expectations. That’s why risk control in trading is essential.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoResearcher
· 6h ago
From the perspective of on-chain data and Token economics, your case perfectly illustrates why technical analysis of market structure fails in highly uncertain markets.
It is worth noting that psychological factors (such as the Year of the Horse symbolism) in projects lacking governance mechanisms cannot guarantee incentive compatibility — which is why retail investor approval cannot translate into actual buying support.
It is recommended to consider Vitalik's views on market efficiency, which assume that the premise of full information disclosure and decentralized governance are met, but new projects clearly do not satisfy these conditions.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 6h ago
Another story of a "low-priced new project," are you still proud to share after being trapped?
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 6h ago
actually read the contract lol... those vesting schedules always dump on schedule 💀
Reply0
MaticHoleFiller
· 6h ago
40,000 units are locked up, this is the normal state for new projects...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 6h ago
Damn, it's another new scam project. I've seen this trick way too many times.
I recently acquired a newly launched project, with a cost of 40,000, and I am currently holding it at a loss. This is a personal trading record; sharing it is not a recommendation, just to document the thought process at the time.
Contract address: 0x4441ea3dfdd1f070a6c8e803d2b4c94c01ef4444
Why did I initially like this project? There are a few main reasons.
First is time sensitivity. This is a new project launched just a few minutes ago, and at that time, on-chain capital flow was very active, with high trading enthusiasm. During such a window, participants are generally early followers who are optimistic about this type of project.
Second is the price dimension. 40,000 is not a high price, and from a technical perspective, there is relatively ample room for growth upward. Many times, new projects attract incremental funds through such low prices.
Another factor is the market structure. At that time, the first wave of internal capital had basically been exhausted, and the market was beginning to see if new major funds could be introduced. I noticed that some projects that performed well before were also gathering momentum at this stage, which usually indicates that a second wave of market movement might be brewing.
There is also a detail about the project's symbolism. 2026 is the Year of the Horse, and the project's name and meaning both point to "wealth," which can psychologically appeal to retail investors.
However, looking back now, this trade serves as a reminder — even if the fundamentals, timing, and psychology all seem favorable for the project, market uncertainty still far exceeds expectations. That’s why risk control in trading is essential.