2026-01-17 16:22:28

After this ordeal, it's really time to calmly assess the long-term situation. Does the combination of USD1 and a certain DeFi lending protocol still have a future? Can their relationship be maintained?

Honestly, this de-pegging incident, regardless of whether it ends perfectly or not, has like a thorn stuck in every user's heart. The first reaction when seeing this stablecoin now is definitely not "a stable $1," but rather "oh, that coin that once de-pegged." Trust is like that—easy to break but hard to rebuild.

For DeFi lending protocols that heavily rely on trust and stability, this is a significant long-term blow. No matter how advanced the technology is or how tempting the story, once the underlying assets face credibility issues, the entire ecosystem begins to wobble.

In the short term, if the team can strongly stabilize this stablecoin, the storm will pass, and the price will rebound. But what about the long term? If a certain DeFi lending protocol wants to go further, it must not put all its eggs in one basket of a single stablecoin. That’s a dead end. It must quickly introduce more diversified and market-recognized stablecoins like USDC and USDT as core assets to reduce concentration risk on a single asset. Otherwise, if problems arise again, it might not be so easy to get through.

Therefore, the key to observing the future development of such DeFi protocols is not just the short-term price fluctuations, but whether they fundamentally adjust their asset strategies. Will they truly diversify? Dare they let go of dependence on a single stablecoin? These are the real issues that determine long-term survival. Short-term technical fixes are just a stopgap; true recovery requires changing the underlying structure.

USD1-0.02%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanLarry

· 4h ago

Honestly, this de-pegging is like a model opera; no one will dare to trust this coin easily in the future. The egg-shaped basket theory can't save it; we need to diversify across multiple chains and tokens to have a chance. Technical fixes are just superficial; the key is whether the team dares to truly adjust asset allocations. If a stablecoin crashes, the entire ecosystem's credibility also takes a hit—that's the reality. Next time there's a crisis, USDT and USDC might be the life savers, right? Basically, it's a gamble on character—betting whether the team has truly learned their lesson. I really want to see how this protocol will adjust; real money will test the slogans.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter_9000

· 4h ago

A single sentence sums it up: all-in single-asset DeFi is a suicidal play. The issue of de-pegging is like branding a mark on users' minds; they will never trust again. Diversification is not just a bonus; it's the bottom line for survival.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 4h ago

Coins that have lost their peg will never return to the way they were before, and this psychological barrier is more deadly than anything else. One stablecoin damages credibility, and the entire ecosystem has to take the blame; DeFi is so fragile. Fixing with technical patches is useless; the key is diversification. Don't gamble your fate on a single coin. If there's another collapse, no one will dare to touch it again. This might be the last chance. Instead of watching the coin price rebound, it's better to see if they dare to truly accept USDC and USDT. That’s the real test. Honestly, changing the system is more important than any PR; otherwise, it will happen again sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 4h ago

Basically, once trust is broken, it's very hard to put it back together. This de-pegging has served as a lesson for everyone. Diversification sounds easy to say but hard to do. Let's see how the team proceeds. Putting all your eggs in one basket will eventually lead to trouble—this is nothing new. The real test isn't in the rebound, but whether people's trust can be restored. Instead of waiting and watching, it's better to diversify risks now. This is the basic strategy for survival.

View OriginalReply0

faded_wojak.eth

· 4h ago

A thorn, huh? You're so right. Once trust is broken, it's truly broken. No matter how you try to mend it, it can never be the same again. Diversified allocation? Dream on. These protocols are all too greedy. If there's a problem next time, it's probably game over. No third chance.

View OriginalReply0

BlockDetective

· 4h ago

The de-pegging issue... once trust is broken, it's truly shattered. No matter how much you try to fix it, cracks will still be visible. Multi-chain and multi-token are the way to go; protocols betting on a single stablecoin will eventually fail. Next time there might not be such good luck, so a real overhaul of the system is necessary.

View OriginalReply0

IntrovertMetaverse

· 4h ago

Once trust is broken, it's very hard to rebuild. This recent blow to USD1 indeed causes long-term damage. In simple terms, it depends on whether they dare to truly diversify moving forward. Relying on a single asset is a ticking time bomb. No matter how advanced the technology is, it can't fix credibility issues. DeFi's gameplay relies heavily on trust.

View OriginalReply0