2026-01-17 15:31:51

The current airdrop market is highly competitive, with participation thresholds for most TGE activities rising above 240 points. The number of airdrops available per cycle is limited. To maximize returns, consider shifting to activities with lower score requirements—even if the project is small, the accumulated gains can be quite substantial. One approach is to actively reduce your account points, gradually consuming from 225 points down to 210 points. In this score range, there are more activities to participate in, and opportunities are actually more abundant.

Regarding startup capital, if you lack BNB to participate in activities, lending platforms are an option, but be very cautious—buying coins directly to join activities can easily lead to being trapped, with high costs and risks. It is recommended to evaluate the cost of funds carefully before taking action; otherwise, the airdrop gains may not be enough to offset the losses from purchasing coins.

BNB0,85%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Lonely_Validator

· 17h ago

Lowering your score to get airdrops? I haven't tried this trick before, it feels a bit like reverse psychology. Could it end up causing you to miss out on high-quality projects?

View OriginalReply0

StrawberryIce

· 17h ago

Lowering the score, I've tried this trick and indeed managed to mine quite a few small projects, but it takes time to filter through them. Borrowing coins to trade is the easiest way to get burned; some people around me have already quit the scene because of this. Low-score activities seem to offer more opportunities, but can you really guarantee a success rate? Diversifying to earn small profits is good, but I'm worried that one careless move could wipe out everything. The 240-point threshold is indeed competitive, but is lowering it to 210 really worth it? It feels like I need to do the math. Participating in borrowing and lending competitions is too risky; once you calculate the interest costs, you know it's not worth it.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 17h ago

I've tried the lowering score strategy, and it indeed allows participation in more opportunities, but you need to be patient and take your time; rushing is not advisable. Wait, borrowing to participate in airdrops? That’s a bit risky, has anyone calculated the costs? Although low-score rounds are smaller in scale, they can still add up, as long as you take the time to filter out the junk projects. I've seen too many cases where buying tokens and getting caught in a trap, with the capital costs outweighing the gains. Staying at the 210 score range is quite strategic; the opportunities are indeed twice as many compared to above 240. But what I fear most is that the airdrops earned through hard work get dumped right after launch, making all the effort pointless. Has anyone analyzed the success rate of projects in the low-score rounds?

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 18h ago

Lowering scores to get airdrops sounds like picking low-key flowers in the garden, but my experience is—it's really about careful calculation. I've fallen into the trap of BNB lending before; directly buying tokens to participate in activities is just cutting your own leeks.

View OriginalReply0