2026-01-17 14:59:52

Some people are just that kind of personality—initially trying to resolve conflicts through transparency and honesty, but the more they try, the more they feel dissatisfied. In the end, they attempt to "force" an official statement through power or capital. I've seen this routine happen several times.

Fans generally don't care much about the details. Those who are truly involved won't delve into it either. But personality really determines the way one responds. Some choose to stay low-key for a few months, and after the wind blows over, nothing happens. Others insist on fighting back, repeatedly speaking out, which ultimately escalates the situation.

This gives me a reminder: sometimes silence is the smartest choice. No explanations, no debates, no attempts to change the outcome through public opinion pressure. Especially in a Web3 decentralized community, where information flows quickly and memory cycles are short. Compared to long-term confrontation, sometimes going incognito is the best strategy.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeVictim

· 5h ago

The more you explain, the darker it gets. This principle is vividly demonstrated in the crypto circle... Can we all learn from those who are low-key? It's really much better than repeatedly clashing. Silence is golden, especially true in Web3. Short memory spans make you the chosen one. Hard confrontation ultimately just makes you angry; it's not worth it. I really dislike those who make things worse to prove themselves. Forget it, buddy. Sometimes, just keeping quiet is more effective than anything else.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 5h ago

The more I explain, the more confused I get. I guess I've seen through it. Silence is indeed valuable.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 5h ago

The myth of transparency and honesty has long gone bankrupt in Web3. The memory cycle of decentralized communities is so short that repeated voices only serve to add weight to oneself. I've seen too many cases where project teams shoot themselves in the foot. --- Power and capital can't produce effective consensus; instead, they tend to expose the fragility of governance mechanisms. Passing quietly is the true way to understand the community's operational logic. --- Silence is indeed a high-level tactic, but only if your fundamentals can stand firm. Otherwise, it's just silence as an admission of guilt. --- The saying that personality determines response methods hits the nail on the head. But the real test is whether you can withstand public opinion pressure without wavering—that's true governance resilience. --- The idea of stealth tactics sounds a bit虚 (vague). The key still depends on how to regain trust afterward; otherwise, it just becomes逃避 (avoidance). --- The short memory cycle of Web3 communities is indeed a double-edged sword. You can hide from storms, but it's also easy to be covered by new topics, and in the end, no one remembers what you did. --- Instead of fussing over silence or speaking out, it's better to first design a good proposal process and incentive mechanism. When the mechanism is right, personal character becomes less critical.

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 5h ago

Honestly, the more I explain, the worse it gets. This has really been tested and proven to be true. Wait, is this logic also popular on the chain? I thought it was only the traditional internet approach. Is the saying "Silence is golden" really correct? I see that some people become more vicious online when they go incognito. A few months of low profile and it can be over, but I feel it's not that simple. This move of power capital, Web3 should think about it again. Watching this psychological buildup process is really uncomfortable. Why bother? Repeatedly speaking out only intensifies the situation, which is really digging your own grave. I agree that going incognito is the best strategy, but it depends on who the opponent is. The short memory cycle is indeed true in the crypto world. When the next hot topic comes out, who will still remember?

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll

· 5h ago

Honestly, I've seen this routine more in the crypto world. At first, they act generous, but then they still cause trouble. The result is just shooting themselves in the foot. Being low-key for a few months is truly awesome. The forgetfulness of Web3 people is beyond your imagination. I hate those who keep speaking out repeatedly. The more you explain, the more it hurts.

View OriginalReply0