2026-01-17 10:35:11

Recently, I have been paying attention to the technical architecture of Dusk Network, and its approach is quite interesting. It’s not the completely transparent approach of ETH, nor is it a purely anonymous scheme like Monero, but rather a balance in the middle — auditable privacy.

It seems this design is specifically tailored for financial institutions. Regulators can verify, and user privacy can also be protected, taking care of both sides. If a major exchange platform like some top-tier ones really wants to do on-chain settlement, they probably need to consider this direction. Purely anonymous cryptocurrencies? Honestly, under the current compliance environment, it’s almost impossible to pass.

Regulation and privacy are indeed an eternal contradiction, but Dusk’s approach seems to have found a feasible path.

DUSK-7,77%

ETH-1,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProposalManiac

· 01-20 10:29

In simple terms, this is a design that balances controllable privacy—regulators can see, users can also feel secure—a model of incentive compatibility. The approach used by Monero was doomed to fail long ago.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-2fce706c

· 01-20 06:05

I've been saying this all along, the key to Dusk's strategy has long been discussed: finding the balance between regulation and privacy is the future's commanding height. If you haven't started deploying now, it's too late. --- This thing, to put it simply, is the secret to wealth. Whoever first captures the track of auditable privacy will win. --- Don't obsess over pure anonymous coins anymore; that's outdated. The trend is clear: institutional-grade privacy solutions are the next hot spot. --- I've been discussing this logic with people three years ago. Now that Dusk has implemented it, are there still doubts? --- Don't miss out, everyone. The entry of financial institutions is only a matter of time. Those who enter early will hold the chips. --- Privacy solutions that are friendly to regulation—that's the correct stance for future blockchain development. Everything else must give way. --- How many are still hyping pure anonymous coins, unaware that others have already switched tracks? That's what we call information asymmetry.

View OriginalReply0

FomoAnxiety

· 01-18 08:23

Honestly, this "auditable privacy" sounds like trying to do two things at once... Satisfying institutions and users, but it seems like one side will always have to be sacrificed. Currently, the trend seems to be that we have to bow to regulators. The era of purely anonymous coins is probably over. Dusk's approach is good, but when it actually gets implemented, it might turn out to be another story... This is the reality—privacy and compliance can’t really be achieved simultaneously. I'm optimistic about this balance, but do exchanges dare to adopt it? The risk is just too high.

View OriginalReply0

0xLuckbox

· 01-17 11:05

The auditable privacy logic is truly excellent, neither offending regulators nor becoming completely transparent. Dusk has really identified the pain points.

View OriginalReply0

ForkPrince

· 01-17 11:03

The auditable privacy system, to put it simply, is a compromise solution, but it's already good enough to survive. --- Dusk offers a fresh perspective; it's much smarter than projects that are either fully transparent or completely anonymous. --- That's just the reality—pure privacy coins should have accepted their fate long ago. Compliance is the way to go. --- Financial institutions definitely need this kind of solution. Exchanges have been waiting for a scheme like this. --- Finding a balance is not easy, but can it really be implemented? It all depends on the adoption rate. --- Trying to please both sides makes the challenge even greater, but the overall idea is solid. --- Exactly, honestly, pure anonymity is a dead end in today's environment. --- It's quite interesting—auditable yet privacy-protecting. That's the right approach. --- I see promise in Dusk's approach; it's more practical than I initially thought. --- They've done a good job weighing the options, but the key is whether it will actually be adopted.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotDayLaborer

· 01-17 11:03

Honestly, this idea of auditable privacy is the first time I've seen such a clear explanation. It seems that Dusk has indeed hit the intersection of policy and market. However, how many institutions will actually be able to adopt this system? We'll have to wait and see. Pure anonymous coins should have been phased out long ago; who still dares to touch them? Regulation is truly unavoidable. Instead of fighting it, it's better to think about coexistence. Dusk's logic is quite pragmatic. By the way, how does the performance of this architecture look? Can privacy and efficiency be achieved simultaneously? Actually, it's just a matter of perspective—why insist on choosing a side? Die-hard Monero fans definitely won't buy it. I'm optimistic about this direction, but the real test is still ahead.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocDetective

· 01-17 11:00

To be honest, this balance point is indeed clever, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on subsequent execution. Regulation-friendly privacy? Sounds good, but I'm worried it will become a compromise that leaves both sides dissatisfied. Pure privacy coins are already out of the game; there's no point in arguing about this trend.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 01-17 10:37

This balance point indeed hits the pain point, but the audited privacy system is truly a compromise between reality and ideals.

View OriginalReply0