2026-01-16 04:31:22

#比特币2026年行情展望 From the Ethereum ecosystem perspective, the potential of new projects—PUPP ISE—has attracted over 26,000 addresses through technological empowerment concepts and community development over the past two years. After several exchange listings, its subsequent performance is worth watching. The consensus-building process for such projects is quite interesting in itself.

Are any friends following this trend? Let's discuss your opinions and how you see this opportunity.

$ETH $BNB

ETH-8,56%

BNB-7,2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AltcoinHunter

· 01-19 01:47

26,000 addresses sound okay, but this number isn't impressive in the ETH ecosystem. Need to look further into the token holding distribution.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 01-18 12:02

26,000 addresses sound like a lot, but it depends on the quality of the accumulation. The value of early digital artifacts often lies in the genuine intentions of the participants, rather than just a pile of numbers.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-17 23:12

26000 addresses sound impressive, but the real key is who holds the actual chips.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 01-16 05:00

26,000 addresses sound like a lot, but in the ecosystem, this number isn't really significant... It depends on subsequent trading volume and retention; otherwise, it's just inflated.

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 01-16 04:58

26,000 addresses sound quite lively, but once they go live on an exchange, it's a different story... I've seen many projects like this.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard

· 01-16 04:50

26k addresses sounds statistically insignificant tbh... actually lemme do the math real quick—that's what, 0.00something% of active eth addresses? risk-adjusted returns here are probably getting obliterated by gas fees alone. theoretically speaking the "consensus accumulation" angle is just hype wrapped in soft metrics, but sure go off i guess

Reply0

StealthMoon

· 01-16 04:43

Listening to 26,000 addresses sounds impressive, but the real key is who actually holds the chips.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-16 04:43

26,000 addresses sound like a lot, but it depends on the actual distribution of holdings. Don't tell me it's just a number piled up by the whales again.

View OriginalReply0