There are no absolute winners in the market, only projects that survive the waves.
The Lista project is quite interesting—by the end of 2025, its TVL is projected to reach $4.3 billion, with a 520% surge in half a year, clearly becoming the second-largest on the BNB Chain. The performance is impressive, but the emergency liquidation in November last year still served as a reminder to everyone. The treasury utilization rate soared to 99%, liquidating a position worth $3.5 million in one go, waking both the project and users up sharply.
From this incident, I’ve gleaned a few insights:
**First is the growth logic.** The staking yield of slisBNB combined with lending leverage, along with stacking yields from various external protocols, this strategy directly outperforms traditional financial products. "Yield hunger" is the core driving force—simple, straightforward, and effective.
**Second is risk management.** lisUSD, this stablecoin, relies on over-collateralization and PSM (Peg Stability Module) to stay afloat amid market volatility. The mechanism design is quite sophisticated.
**Third is token economics.** The governance model of LISTA is undergoing adjustments. If the proposal to burn 20% of the total supply passes, it could be promising in the long term. But with veLISTA offering an annualized yield of 38.8%, how much of that is genuine output and how much is inflationary bubble remains to be monitored.
What’s the future direction? Multi-chain expansion and RWA integration are new stories, but stepping out of the BNB comfort zone to fight on Ethereum presents clear risks and opportunities. The fundamentals still need to be stabilized.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenStorm
· 01-18 23:07
A 520% increase is indeed impressive, but the 99% utilization rate of the treasury is the real truth—almost wiped out the team.
veLISTA's 38.8% return, I bet at least half of it is just inflation pumping the bubble.
Leaving BNB for Ethereum? Uh... isn't that just seeking excitement in the eye of the storm?
The liquidation in November last year, I calculated my liquidation price very accurately, and I was liquidated the next day—very much as expected.
A proposal to burn 20% sounds good, but it only has value if it actually passes. Right now, it's all just PPT.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者
· 01-18 19:18
The 99% vault utilization wave really can't hold up, which is why I never go all-in. Lista's growth is fast, but playing the leverage game poorly will just lead to a trap.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-18 09:29
43 billion TVL, the growth rate is indeed rapid. But that 99% vault utilization rate is really scary; risk management needs to be taken more seriously.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-16 15:42
99% vault utilization, playing with fire. A one-time liquidation of $3.5 million, it hurts just to watch.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 01-16 03:56
Haha, that wave in November almost got liquidated, and now I'm still watching veLISTA's 38.8%. Truly Schrödinger's profit.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 01-16 03:52
The wave in November almost crashed, and you're still daring to be so reckless...
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowranger
· 01-16 03:51
The near crash in November was really scary, playing with fire at 99% utilization.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 01-16 03:48
That wave of liquidation in November last year really scared people. The 4.3 billion TVL looks impressive, but behind the scenes, you still have to watch out for the script of leverage liquidation.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercover
· 01-16 03:33
The November liquidation really couldn't hold up anymore. This is the price of leverage.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapist
· 01-16 03:29
4.3 billion TVL sounds great, but when it comes to a one-time liquidation of 3.5 million, you realize that playing the leverage game poorly leads to bloodshed.
There are no absolute winners in the market, only projects that survive the waves.
The Lista project is quite interesting—by the end of 2025, its TVL is projected to reach $4.3 billion, with a 520% surge in half a year, clearly becoming the second-largest on the BNB Chain. The performance is impressive, but the emergency liquidation in November last year still served as a reminder to everyone. The treasury utilization rate soared to 99%, liquidating a position worth $3.5 million in one go, waking both the project and users up sharply.
From this incident, I’ve gleaned a few insights:
**First is the growth logic.** The staking yield of slisBNB combined with lending leverage, along with stacking yields from various external protocols, this strategy directly outperforms traditional financial products. "Yield hunger" is the core driving force—simple, straightforward, and effective.
**Second is risk management.** lisUSD, this stablecoin, relies on over-collateralization and PSM (Peg Stability Module) to stay afloat amid market volatility. The mechanism design is quite sophisticated.
**Third is token economics.** The governance model of LISTA is undergoing adjustments. If the proposal to burn 20% of the total supply passes, it could be promising in the long term. But with veLISTA offering an annualized yield of 38.8%, how much of that is genuine output and how much is inflationary bubble remains to be monitored.
What’s the future direction? Multi-chain expansion and RWA integration are new stories, but stepping out of the BNB comfort zone to fight on Ethereum presents clear risks and opportunities. The fundamentals still need to be stabilized.