2026-01-16 03:22:17

Recently, I saw Solana and NEAR integrate Starknet on the NEAR Intents framework. This collaboration is quite interesting. NEAR, as a leading AI public chain, has undeniable technical strength, and its ecosystem development is also steadily progressing. However, to be honest, compared to the momentum on the marketing side, NEAR's popularity is indeed lagging — this guy has solid skills, but the promotion aspect is somewhat lacking.

In contrast, some projects can become popular through events and brand packaging, but NEAR hasn't fully utilized its identity as an AI public chain. Rather than seeing this as a disadvantage, it should be a key area to focus on in 2026. If NEAR can put effort into brand building and community operation, and fully unleash its ecosystem value, it might change the market's perception of this chain. The hardware is there; it all depends on how they play their cards in the future.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MerkleMaid

· 2h ago

Really, NEAR's technical approach is fine, it's just that the buzz has fizzled out. It's a bit of a pity, why not tell a good story? This time partnering with Starknet is indeed impressive. Why not take the opportunity to create some hype? Marketing can truly determine life or death. No matter how strong the technology is, people need to know about it. NEAR needs to learn how to break into the mainstream. Currently, this level of popularity clearly doesn't make it look like a top-tier public chain.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 2h ago

Haha, NEAR does feel a bit frustrating. The technology is top-notch, but it just doesn’t catch fire. That’s really incredible. --- Solana has already become so competitive, and NEAR is still quietly working away. What are they thinking? --- Honestly, not having a marketing team is the original sin. No matter how strong the technology is, it’s useless. --- Wait, can this partnership really boost NEAR’s popularity? I feel like it’s still a freebie. --- 2026? Bro, you’re way too optimistic. Web3 hot topics change every few months. --- No matter how powerful the hardware is, if you can’t tell a good story, it’s useless. That’s the state of the crypto world. --- NEAR’s problem isn’t technology; it’s that it doesn’t have a compelling narrative to excite people. --- Instead of waiting until 2026, why not start breaking the ice now? The longer you wait, the colder it gets. --- Being called low-key sounds good, but in reality, it’s just no popularity. It’s a vicious cycle. --- Trust me, finding a good marketing head is faster than trying to do everything through integrations.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDoomsDay

· 2h ago

No doubt about the technical strength, but it's too low-key and reserved. Time to come out and show off a bit. Alright, the technical ceiling is set here, just waiting for marketing to catch up. NEAR is really quietly making big moves, which is a bit of a waste. That's why some coins that jump higher than it are truly valuable because of their operations. No matter how strong the technology is, if you can't promote it, it's useless. Learn from others how they became popular. Really, NEAR's not lacking in technology; it lacks that kind of hype management. If the AI public chain's card is played well, it might turn things around. It feels like NEAR just needs a爆点, a spark to suddenly get enlightened.

View OriginalReply0