#美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估 💰 Large-scale mining company's massive holdings exposed: How does $ETH worth $130 billion generate passive income?
Industry insiders have leaked big news — a well-known blockchain company executive revealed that their balance sheet shows holdings of $ETH valued at $130 billion. Just through staking alone, their annual pre-tax income is expected to surpass $400 million. The size of this passive income is enough to make many traditional publicly listed companies envious.
More notably, this company recently invested $200 million into an industry fund managed by a leading content creator, with management even describing the move as a "blind bet." Based on projections, the potential return on this investment could reach 10 times.
However, the other side of the story is that since July last year, the company has been building a large position in $ETH, and unrealized losses have accumulated to $2.3 billion. Given the $130 billion holdings and cash flow pressures, such a massive allocation reflects confidence in the long-term value of crypto assets but also exposes the real risks of short-term volatility.
The trends of $ETH, staking income models, and crypto asset allocation logic — all are worth deep consideration. What’s your view on this betting strategy? Which side do you lean toward in the risk-reward balance?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterBearish
· 01-18 10:48
13 billion dollars in holdings with an unrealized loss of 2.3 billion, this person really has some guts.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 01-16 10:02
Closing your eyes and investing 200 million—either you're a genius or a fool. For now, it looks like 2.3 billion in unrealized losses are teaching them how to behave.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoet
· 01-16 03:33
Closing your eyes and risking 200 million to go all-in, you're really not afraid of 2.3 billion in unrealized losses hitting your hands?
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 01-16 03:28
2.3 billion floating loss still insisting on staking, is this really faith or being trapped?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 01-16 03:19
2.3 billion unrealized losses are still being touted as passive income, this mindset is incredible
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-16 03:07
2.3 billion floating loss still dare to close one eye and invest, how strong is this mentality?
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCat
· 01-16 03:06
2.3 billion floating loss... Investing blindly is indeed risky, but this portfolio is too large to withstand a black swan event.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeaf
· 01-16 03:04
2.3 billion unrealized loss... This is the price of faith.
#美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估 💰 Large-scale mining company's massive holdings exposed: How does $ETH worth $130 billion generate passive income?
Industry insiders have leaked big news — a well-known blockchain company executive revealed that their balance sheet shows holdings of $ETH valued at $130 billion. Just through staking alone, their annual pre-tax income is expected to surpass $400 million. The size of this passive income is enough to make many traditional publicly listed companies envious.
More notably, this company recently invested $200 million into an industry fund managed by a leading content creator, with management even describing the move as a "blind bet." Based on projections, the potential return on this investment could reach 10 times.
However, the other side of the story is that since July last year, the company has been building a large position in $ETH, and unrealized losses have accumulated to $2.3 billion. Given the $130 billion holdings and cash flow pressures, such a massive allocation reflects confidence in the long-term value of crypto assets but also exposes the real risks of short-term volatility.
The trends of $ETH, staking income models, and crypto asset allocation logic — all are worth deep consideration. What’s your view on this betting strategy? Which side do you lean toward in the risk-reward balance?