2026-01-16 03:00:17

Social media showed us one path: maximize engagement, harvest attention, pocket the profits—and leave the collateral damage for society to clean up. Misinformation spread like wildfire, mental health tanked, and honestly, nobody's better off except the shareholders.

But here's the thing: AI doesn't have to repeat that mistake. We actually have the chance to build guardrails early, think about consequences before they blow up in our faces. Whether it's governance frameworks, transparency requirements, or just refusing to optimize purely for engagement metrics—the tech community could choose different priorities right from the start.

The question isn't whether AI will be powerful. It will be. The question is whether we're willing to learn from what went wrong with social media, or if we're just going to rinse and repeat the same extractive model.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-9ad11037

· 7h ago

Honestly, this sounds idealistic, but I don't quite believe it. Tech bros are speaking nicely now, but in the end, isn't it all about bowing to money?

View OriginalReply0

SerNgmi

· 20h ago

The social media model of cutting leeks really is unparalleled. Now it's AI's turn to repeat the same mistakes, right? --- Don't bother with those lofty guardrails; capital is still capital. In the end, it's all about money. --- Alright, I just want to see if this time they'll really learn their lesson. Anyway, I have no hope. --- The key issue is that the tech community has no motivation to change. As long as profits are there, who wants to give up? --- Sounds nice, but when it comes to actual execution, shareholders will still push you down and grind you. --- It's not that complicated. Whoever makes enough money first just wants to be a good person. --- Starting to talk about governance frameworks again? Wake up, they are useless under market logic. --- In the end, it still depends on regulation. Tech self-discipline? Dream on. --- Transparency requirements sound really like a joke. --- Reminds me of Facebook back in the day. And now? Nothing has changed at all.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentLossEnjoyer

· 01-16 03:30

The script of scamming people on social media really can't be repeated again, but I bet five bucks that AI will still have to repeat it this time --- Basically, it all depends on whether tech giants are willing to give up those engagement data, probably just another pie-in-the-sky promise --- Well, isn't this just history repeating itself? Who will be the next target? --- Transparency? Governance framework? These words are shouted every time, but in the end,利益 always outweighs everything --- Setting up guardrails early sounds good, but I'm afraid it will just end with "We didn't anticipate it"

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 01-16 03:29

This article makes a pretty good point, but I have to be honest—project teams talk about "building fences," then turn around and start harvesting profits [thinking] The old tricks of social media have been used up long ago, and now AI is doing the same thing again? From a technical perspective, it's all about maximizing engagement and data extraction, just like before. I'm not trying to discourage everyone, but I haven't seen any project teams truly willing to give up engagement metric optimization.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-16 03:29

The social media tricks of cutting leeks, if AI falls for them again, we're doomed... This time we really need to learn a lesson. --- It sounds good, but tech companies still can't change their profit-driven nature. Do you believe it? --- Establishing a rules framework early on is indeed crucial, but the question is, who will supervise those who set the rules? --- Governance frameworks and transparency requirements sound good, but how will they be implemented? It's just another empty talk session. --- The key issue is... we're still asking questions, rather than taking action. It's quite ironic. --- The power of AI is right there, but in the end, it still depends on how capital wants to play it. --- No one has truly learned the lessons from social media; they just switch to new concepts to continue harvesting, repeatedly. --- This paragraph is well written, but I bet everyone will still be repeating the same tricks two years from now. --- Thinking about Meta and Twitter's operations over those years... Do you really believe AI will take a different path now? That's a bit naive.

View OriginalReply0

MEVVictimAlliance

· 01-16 03:22

We all understand the social media game now, and we're just waiting to see if AI will repeat the same mistakes... I bet it will. Can it be changed? Honestly, it's all talk. Without profit incentives, who the hell would really build protective barriers? Here we go again with the vampire mode, just a name change.

View OriginalReply0

BTCWaveRider

· 01-16 03:17

The tricks of social media to harvest traffic, cut leeks, and shift blame onto society—if AI repeats this, we're truly doomed... That's right, there's still a chance to change now, it depends on whether the tech giants are willing to give up that little profit. But... do you dare to bet that they will choose a different path? Can AI fill this gap? I remain skeptical. It's the same old promises; we'll see when real benefits come in.

View OriginalReply0