A well-known aggressive investor recently made bold remarks at her New York office: over the next three years, the U.S. economic policy environment may trigger a new growth cycle, and the stock market is expected to enter a new upward phase.



Her flagship fund has performed remarkably well over the past year—an increase of 35.5%, nearly twice the gains of mainstream indices. Achieving this was no easy feat. Just a year ago, this investor was controversial and mocked by the market for her aggressive decisions. But the market in 2025 has vindicated her with actual returns.

Her investment logic has remained consistent: take profits when appropriate, then go all-in on the next hot sector. As 2026 approaches, her actions are quite representative—large-scale, strategic positioning in the biotech sector, especially in gene editing and genomics. She has investments across the main players in this emerging industry chain.

This reflects an interesting phenomenon: when macro policy environments change, aggressive capital begins to sense new opportunities. Deregulation, tax cuts, and a stable monetary policy framework create conditions that attract funds to long-term, high-risk, high-potential sectors. Gene editing is precisely such a track—full of promise but requiring capital patience to see it through.

Interestingly, while heavily invested in technological innovation, she has not completely abandoned other allocations. This shows that even aggressive investors are learning how to balance risk and opportunity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusBotvip
· 01-18 19:54
35.5% return rate, this move is indeed bold. But can the gene editing track really catch this wave? Feels like policy directions can change at any moment.
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 01-17 12:19
Wow, 35.5%. This girl was really impressive last year, slapping the faces of those who mocked her.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterNoLossvip
· 01-16 02:53
35.5% this number is quite impressive, but the gene editing field really deserves a look.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 01-16 02:51
A 35.5% increase, in simple terms, means betting on the right trend. Now it's the turn of biotechnology?
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyervip
· 01-16 02:50
35.5% increase? Come on, if the market trend was so easy to catch, everyone would already be a billionaire.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdropvip
· 01-16 02:41
35.5%, awesome! Last year I was criticized, and now I'm proven right.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamonvip
· 01-16 02:36
The 35.5% increase indeed slapped the face of many who were bearish, but what the bear is more concerned about is how she survived the controversy(◍•ᴗ•◍)
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomatonvip
· 01-16 02:32
35.5% increase? Really? Last year I was criticized for being aggressive, and this year I’m directly proving everyone wrong and making money. I need to ponder this logic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)