#RWA代币化 Netflix is planning to produce a comedy film with a crypto theme, centered around the story of losing a wallet password. It sounds interesting, but the underlying phenomenon it reflects warrants caution.

Thinking back on the evolution of crypto’s image in media over the years— from money laundering crime films to now romantic comedies— it seems normalized, but in reality, it’s just a flow of traffic. More and more mainstream narratives are entering the scene, which precisely indicates a problem: crypto is gradually becoming a consumer product and entertainment element, rather than a financial infrastructure.

The most critical point is that phrase—"Crypto has not yet deeply integrated into daily life." That’s exactly where the risk lies. When something hasn’t been truly implemented but is instead packaged as a cultural symbol to enter popular aesthetics, caution is needed. Concepts like RWA tokenization and payment wallets sound high-end, but in reality, how many are genuine needs, and how many are just fabricated storylines for fundraising?

Experience tells me that the more these "breaking into the mainstream" moments occur, the easier it is to hide a new round of rug pulls. It’s not that crypto has no prospects, but when capital starts using cultural packaging to cultivate consensus, ordinary people must learn to distinguish—between those "futures" that are artificially shaped and the technologies that can truly solve problems, and how big the difference is.

Don’t get dazzled by Hollywood narratives. The real question is: Are these projects genuinely solving practical problems, or are they just telling a nice story?