Fast forward three years, and the narrative around prediction markets as the future of finance will likely look embarrassingly overblown. The hype cycle has been undeniable—yet dig deeper and you'll struggle to find substantive takes that go beyond surface-level enthusiasm. Most commentary reads like manufactured psyop, lacking any real analytical depth. When something gets this much attention with so little genuine insight, it's worth asking whether we're witnessing innovation or just collective delusion. The gap between the promise and the actual utility keeps widening.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMaskedRider
· 01-17 14:50
Basically, it's just another round of cutting leeks. Get ready to be proven wrong.
Market prediction? It sounds just like the last AI hype—just hype and that's it.
These people really dare to say that, the gap is as big as heaven and earth.
There's a Pacific Ocean between promises and reality—how do they cross it?
Collective delusion +1, it’s exhausting just watching it.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-16 12:30
The rhetoric of the prediction market now sounds like a joke
Another wave of doomed narratives, I'm tired of it
Promises that match reality? That's a miracle, it's all just air
Once this round of hype passes, no one will remember it
In-depth analysis? Where does depth come from in this circle? It's all repeaters
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartel
· 01-16 00:15
Predicting the market... I'm tired of hearing about it. Every day it's just talk, and no one can really explain anything clearly.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 01-16 00:12
Basically, it's just another wave of cutting leeks. I'm already tired of the predictions and market hype.
They shout concepts loudly, but no one actually implements them. The gap is becoming more and more obvious.
Everyone is hyping it up, but when asked about the specifics of implementation, there's no response. A typical Web3 narrative killer.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHunter
· 01-15 23:54
This is the common problem of Web3—constantly hyping prediction markets as changing finance, but after three years, it's still just pie-in-the-sky.
It's another round of the same old scam—pumping concepts without any real implementation.
Well said, most people are just following the trend and haven't thought about why they should use prediction markets.
There are too many prophets and too few builders; this illness is quite serious.
The gap between promises and reality... truly worlds apart.
Fast forward three years, and the narrative around prediction markets as the future of finance will likely look embarrassingly overblown. The hype cycle has been undeniable—yet dig deeper and you'll struggle to find substantive takes that go beyond surface-level enthusiasm. Most commentary reads like manufactured psyop, lacking any real analytical depth. When something gets this much attention with so little genuine insight, it's worth asking whether we're witnessing innovation or just collective delusion. The gap between the promise and the actual utility keeps widening.