Honestly, very few products make me feel this repulsed. Some AI data tools and certain hunter apps are exceptions.



The problem isn't with the products themselves, but with the entire narrative. Why label every creator? Why use suggestive frameworks to guide users? This is essentially PUA (Pick-Up Artist) tactics.

What’s even more upsetting is the core assumption—that you need AI to help you make investment judgments or distinguish between true and false? That logic is fundamentally flawed. Investment decisions shouldn't be outsourced to any tool, especially when the algorithm behind the tool is opaque.

Instead of chasing after being told "what to do" by machines, it's better to spend time understanding the market itself.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 01-18 11:27
One glance and you'll see it's just trying to brainwash you Untransparent algorithms and you want me to trust them? Haha This narrative is really top-notch, the essence of PUA Rather than being led by machines, it's better to understand the market yourself Tags, guidance, hints... what are they doing? Outsourcing investment decisions? I'm not that foolish
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanistervip
· 01-17 18:33
That's the truth. Too many products rely on labeling to harvest profits. Still thinking an algorithm black box will guide my investments? Dream on. Rather than trusting machines, it's better to trust your own exploration; otherwise, you're paying an IQ tax.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTradervip
· 01-16 00:07
That's so true. This narrative logic is just harvesting anxiety. Leading people into a trap, pretending to be very professional, but it's just the same old story with a different wrapping. Why should opaque algorithms be worth trusting? It's better to read the charts yourself.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastingMaximalistvip
· 01-16 00:06
Damn, this PUA narrative is really on point, messing with people's minds in reverse. Algorithm black box + investment decisions, this combo is just outrageous. Why should we trust something that can't clearly explain its logic? You still have to analyze the details yourself; don't be fed by machines.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMinervip
· 01-15 23:51
Algorithm black box decision-making, I don't buy into this. --- PUA-style guidance is really disgusting; labeling people and still feeling good about it. --- Outsourcing investment judgment to opaque tools? Are you out of your mind? --- It's better to trust your own judgment than to rely on machines; that's the core. --- Labeling creators with that routine is no different from collecting IQ taxes. --- Count me out; the narrative logic of this kind of product is just absurd. --- Telling you how to invest with machines? Isn't that just gambling outsourcing? --- No transparency and still dare to sell decision-making power, who trusts and who loses. --- Labeling everyone and guiding with frameworks—that's just precise leek-cutting.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapistvip
· 01-15 23:40
This PUA-style narrative is really amazing, so we all have to rely on machines to help us think, right? --- Algorithm black box giving investment advice? Isn't that just making us collectively lose our minds? --- Heartbreaking, just trying to make you feel like you need it. --- Daring to give weights to opaque things? Or forget it. --- Rather than trusting machines, it's better to trust your own brain, it's that simple. --- That set of tagging systems is really disgusting; marketing tricks are exposed so thoroughly yet they still use them. --- The core issue is outsourcing decision-making power, which is just stupid. --- Spending time understanding the market vs. being fed by algorithms, the choice still lies with you. --- PUA's approach is brilliant, it's just a disguised way of controlling the narrative.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin