2026-01-15 23:21:56

Here's the thing about trustless architecture—it crumbles the moment you hand your data to a single entity. The whole point falls apart. When one provider controls the information flow, you're right back to trusting them. That's not decentralization anymore; that's just centralized systems with extra steps. True trustless design demands distributed validation, not concentrated gateways. Otherwise, you've just rebuilt the old problem in a new wrapper.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerNgmi

· 01-18 19:52

Basically, it's just a change of superficial appearance without real decentralization verification; all those claiming to be decentralized are lying.

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-15 23:45

That's right, it's just centralized with a different facade, but there's no true decentralization at all.

View OriginalReply0

SerLiquidated

· 01-15 23:45

Basically, it's just a rebranding without changing the substance, still trying to deceive us into trusting a single intermediary.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-15 23:44

Damn, you're so right. A bunch of projects are just centralized scams disguised as Web3.

View OriginalReply0

GasGoblin

· 01-15 23:42

Basically, it's just a change of superficial appearance without changing the substance. It sounds fancy, but it's still the same old thing.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 01-15 23:40

It looks like they're reusing old tricks again... Single-point failure triggers chain liquidation within 0.618 seconds, I've seen this happen too many times.

View OriginalReply0