#比特币价格波动 Recently, I came across an interesting analysis report suggesting that a decline in mining activity is considered a bullish signal for Bitcoin. Data shows that when network hash rate decreases, the probability of positive returns within 90 days can reach 65%, higher than the 54% when hash rate increases. The logic behind this is quite straightforward—weaker miners exit under pressure, which actually indicates market self-purification.
But I want to remind everyone that no matter how good a technical signal is, it shouldn't be the sole reason for heavy position bets. While historical relevance can be somewhat informative, it fundamentally involves a 35% chance of the opposite outcome. Moreover, Bitcoin itself is a highly volatile asset, and no single indicator is sufficient to support all our decisions.
If you're considering adjusting your position, my advice is to return to the fundamentals: what is your risk tolerance, what percentage of your overall assets should be in crypto, and at what price level is your true stop-loss point. Think through these questions carefully before referencing any market signals. In the long run, prudent position management and a clear investment plan are often more important than chasing every technical "opportunity."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#比特币价格波动 Recently, I came across an interesting analysis report suggesting that a decline in mining activity is considered a bullish signal for Bitcoin. Data shows that when network hash rate decreases, the probability of positive returns within 90 days can reach 65%, higher than the 54% when hash rate increases. The logic behind this is quite straightforward—weaker miners exit under pressure, which actually indicates market self-purification.
But I want to remind everyone that no matter how good a technical signal is, it shouldn't be the sole reason for heavy position bets. While historical relevance can be somewhat informative, it fundamentally involves a 35% chance of the opposite outcome. Moreover, Bitcoin itself is a highly volatile asset, and no single indicator is sufficient to support all our decisions.
If you're considering adjusting your position, my advice is to return to the fundamentals: what is your risk tolerance, what percentage of your overall assets should be in crypto, and at what price level is your true stop-loss point. Think through these questions carefully before referencing any market signals. In the long run, prudent position management and a clear investment plan are often more important than chasing every technical "opportunity."