2026-01-08 07:25:20

Be cautious when using AI coding tools. Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, and similar code assistants have permissions equivalent to system-level access, essentially allowing them to control your computer—from rewriting files to executing programs. Especially when Cursor opens project folders, it may automatically trigger underlying scripts without your awareness.

This poses an even greater risk for Web3 developers. If the project involves private keys, mnemonics, or smart contract deployment scripts, any accidental operation or malicious exploitation by these tools could have disastrous consequences.

Therefore, it is recommended to do two things: First, the computer running the AI coding tools must be completely separated from your Web3 wallet computer—physical isolation, and not connected to the same network. Second, before use, check the project folder for suspicious scripts, especially startup files and configuration files. It's better to spend an extra two minutes reviewing than to let the tools run unchecked in the background.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-beba108d

· 19h ago

Now it's settled, I need to buy a computer dedicated to running AI code tools again. Storing the private key on a single machine is really terrifying; I never thought about the permissions system of Cursor. Why are there so many pitfalls? It feels like the development cost has increased again. Alright, physical isolation it is. Better to be a bit more trouble than have my wallet stolen by hackers. I didn't pay attention to this before; luckily I saw this reminder. Wait, does Cursor automatically execute scripts? Does that mean the projects I opened earlier might have issues?

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 22h ago

Oh my, you just mentioned it. I've already separated two computers long ago. No way, are there still people using the same computer for Cursor and wallet? Cursor is really a bit scary, doing things secretly and invisibly. Private keys and code mixed together, you really need to handle it carefully. Physical isolation is the safest, but it's a bit troublesome. Who hasn't encountered those weird automatic scripts... Now it's all good, another reason to buy a new computer haha. Checking scripts really should become a habit, or you'll find out you've been compromised one day.

View OriginalReply0

ETHReserveBank

· 22h ago

This really needs to be taken seriously now. The permissions for Cursor are indeed ridiculously high. Storing the private key on the same computer is definitely asking for trouble; physical isolation is a must. Last time, I almost opened the wallet configuration file directly in Cursor, it scared me to death. Reviewing scripts may seem troublesome, but thinking about the lost funds makes it worth it. Tools like Cursor are untrustworthy; it feels like they could undermine you at any time. Splitting onto two separate computers is really a good suggestion; spending a bit more money is better than losing coins.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 22h ago

Now it's all good, another computer to quarantine... Damn, is Cursor this powerful? I really didn't expect that. Once the private key was exposed, it was game over. Being too cautious is not enough. Separating two computers is a small matter; checking scripts is the real hassle. But on the other hand, how many people would really go through such trouble? Oh my, I never thought about this when I used Cursor before.

View OriginalReply0

NoodlesOrTokens

· 22h ago

Hmm... Cursor really dares to play like this, no wonder I always feel a bit uneasy. Oh my, if the private key leaks, I'm done for. Physical isolation is a brilliant move, but it's a bit troublesome. Why does it feel like now every developer has to guard against tools? I think most people haven't thought of this at all. Cursor has given me a warning. This risk is too deadly for small developers. Fortunately, I didn't use the Web3 computer together. It must be kept separate, or else wait to be exploited. Has anyone suffered a loss because of this? It feels like the risk is seriously underestimated.

View OriginalReply0