2026-01-08 06:24:38

The Survival Rules of the "Luo Mao" Track: Proactive Analysis vs. Passive Following

Many people enter the Web3 ecosystem and are eager to participate in various "Luo Mao" projects. They look for tutorials, copy operational procedures, mechanically replicate others' steps—basically, they lack their own thinking. What's the result? They can only drink the soup, watching the top participants eat the meat.

What's the difference? Depth. Those who truly make money are not simply following trends but asking: What is the logic of this project? How is the incentive mechanism designed? Is the anti-witch mechanism完善? Is the team background reliable? How large is the market potential?

The same principle applies to Web2 online earning. Information gaps always exist, but opportunities are always reserved for those willing to think. Blindly following trends will inevitably lead to falling behind.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-08 06:54

Honestly, I've heard this many times, but few actually follow through... --- It's the same analysis theory again, but how many people have truly dug into the incentive mechanisms? --- The difference between drinking soup and eating meat is just a matter of mindset; there's no doubt about that. --- Information asymmetry has long been leveled, now it's all about speed and courage. --- There are many followers, but very few who can坚持 independent thinking. --- Most people overlook details like the anti-witch mechanism and rush in directly... --- Everyone understands the principles, but execution is the hardest part; most people still choose to lie flat.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere