2026-01-08 05:24:59

The mechanism design of this project is very interesting. After users publish contract addresses on the chain, the system automatically generates new contract addresses for them, creating a viral spread effect. Combined with the token burn mechanism, the entire growth model forms a self-reinforcing cycle—each diffusion is accompanied by inflation reduction. This snowball-like burn logic indeed captures market psychology. From the perspective of on-chain mechanism design, this type of automated token growth model is a relatively innovative attempt in the Web3 space.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RunWhenCut

· 01-10 09:24

Viral spread + destruction mechanism, this combo really packs a punch, but I'm just worried that in the end, it's still the old trick of harvesting the little guys.

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 01-10 08:29

nah this viral address generation thing sounds like it's got more holes than a slashed validator set tbh. deflationary mechanics are cool on paper but network resilience? that's where most projects fall apart when the incentives get weird.

Reply0

HashBandit

· 01-08 09:32

ngl this viral contract generation thing screams ponzi energy to me... back in my mining days we'd see similar mechanics tank harder than GPU rigs in a bear market. the "self-reinforcing loop" part? that's just inflation with extra steps lmao

Reply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-08 05:54

According to the tokenomics model in the white paper, this self-reinforcing cycle mechanism actually has hidden risks of incentive incompatibility, specifically reflected in the equilibrium between the destruction rate and the frequency of new address generation.

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 01-08 05:54

Hmm, this self-reinforcing destruction logic is indeed quite a move... but can it really withstand market cycles?

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer