2026-01-08 04:31:37

Recently, $WLD's performance has been quite interesting—30-minute K-line trading volume has surged by 171%. Such a level of volume change is usually not to be taken lightly.

From the data, the current price is hovering around 0.5909 USDT. The support level is set at 0.5914 (only 0.39% above the 1-hour benchmark), and there is a support zone below between 0.5861 and 0.5914, which looks well defended.

From a technical perspective, this position is close to a key support, and the opportunity to go long is worth paying attention to. If you want to participate, you can place an order around 0.5914, with a take-profit target at the resistance level of 0.6044.

The key point is—abnormal volume expansion often signals that the market is about to start moving, and this is when patience is most tested. Keep a close eye on how it develops next.

WLD-1,56%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

quietly_staking

· 11h ago

171% trading volume surge? There's something to this move, but I still need to watch and see. --- Support and defense are so solid... Feels like someone is laying in wait at the bottom? --- Unusual increase in trading volume is definitely a signal, but whether it can really rise this time depends on the follow-up. --- I just want to know if this wave can break 0.6044 after it rises, otherwise it's just a false alarm. --- Placing an order around here? I'll observe first, no need to rush. --- Trading volume skyrocketed but the price is still hovering here, I always feel something's off. --- At this position, I usually choose to wait, afraid of catching the last move.

View OriginalReply0

Blockchainiac

· 01-08 21:57

171% of trading volume, is that all? Wake up, is this called activation or the prelude to cutting leeks? Hey, support at 0.5914, it feels like it's about to be broken again. Can it hold this time? Is the volume amplification really reliable, or are we about to be tricked again? The pressure around 0.6044 is a bit heavy. Breaking through would be truly interesting. Wait a minute, why do I feel like this coin has just been oscillating like this before? Is history repeating? I'm not placing any more orders. I'll observe a few more candlesticks first. Entering now is most likely to get stabbed.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 01-08 05:00

171% trading volume, is this really happening or are they just trying to trick me into buying the dip? By the way, with so many support levels, it feels a bit like stacking... Wait, could this be another capital test? I really can't hold on anymore, every time they say "prelude," it ends up crashing even worse. I'll just watch for now, not taking any action.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-08 04:58

171% trading volume? Sounds a bit exaggerated, but I see that the support at 0.5914 is pretty solid. Just not sure how long it can hold up. I'm not really willing to bet on it; it feels like during times like this, the main players are testing the market. We'll have to see how it develops next. WLD seems to be doing some tricks this round; such a strong trading volume usually isn't a good sign.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-08 04:48

171% trading volume surge, this move is either a pump or a dump, betting on patience.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-08 04:41

Honestly, a 171% volume is a bit scary, but these times are often the night before a harvest for the chives. Wait, you want to stop me at 0.5914? I think it's unlikely. If it can't break 0.6044, I’ll pretend I’ve never seen this coin.

View OriginalReply0

VibesOverCharts

· 01-08 04:34

What does 171% volume indicate? Is there really something here this time? Or is it just another tactic to trap retail investors? I think we should wait before taking action.

View OriginalReply0