Privacy coin sector surges again. On the 8th of this month, Josh Swihart, CEO of Electric Coin Company (ECC), the core development company behind Zcash, spoke out on social media, announcing that the entire ECC team has collectively resigned.



The trigger for the incident stems from deep disagreements at the governance level. Swihart openly stated that the majority of the board members of ECC's parent organization, Bootstrap (a non-profit organization)—including Zaki Manian, Christina Garman, Alan Fairless, and Michelle Lai—have clearly deviated from Zcash's original mission. He pointed out that yesterday's alleged dismissal of ZCAM forced the team to make the difficult decision to leave.

"Our employment terms were unilaterally modified," Swihart admitted, "which prevented us from fulfilling our duties with integrity and effectiveness." His words reveal a strong disappointment with the current governance structure.

It is worth noting that Swihart later emphasized that the impact of this turmoil is limited. The Zcash protocol itself remains completely unaffected. The initial reason for the resignation decision was to protect the team's years of technological achievements and prevent them from being subjected to improper governance interference—interference that has made ECC unable to uphold its original mission: to create truly unstoppable privacy currencies.

The departing team has already begun establishing a new company to continue upholding the same privacy principles. This internal split reflects the tensions that can arise between governance structures and technical teams during the rapid development of privacy coin projects. For ZEC holders and the community, how to balance decentralized decision-making with technological stability remains a key issue to watch.
ZEC-4.49%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SilentAlphavip
· 13h ago
ZEC is causing internal conflicts again; I'm tired of the same old trick of the development team running away.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermitvip
· 01-08 05:00
It's the same old story again, the privacy coin path is doomed to be plagued by internal conflicts. Developers have left, but the protocol still has to continue? I don't think so. Bootstrap's team has really lost sight of their original intention. How long will it take for a new team to rise and start messing around again? ZEC holders really have to take a gamble this time.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.ethvip
· 01-08 04:55
Another case of governance collapse, this is what so-called decentralization looks like. ZEC's recent performance is a bit weak; the core team has left. Who will maintain it going forward? Let's wait and see what new team can come up with. The story of privacy coins always sounds very appealing, but in the end, it always ends in internal conflicts. By the way, who is behind these board members pushing things forward? Are they really acting in the best interest of the project?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirtervip
· 01-08 04:52
zec this move really can't hold up, did the governance team force the entire development team to resign? This is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalkervip
· 01-08 04:37
Once again, governance issues have arisen. I'm getting tired of this routine. Losing a lot of ECC teams is somewhat desperate, but if the ZEC protocol itself is fine, then it's not a big problem. I'm just worried that the new team might cause some trouble again. Privacy coins still need to focus on solid technical development; internal conflicts are pointless. Whether they can protect their code achievements with this move depends on how things develop next.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)