The proposed depeg insurance for USX could be a smart move to restore confidence following the recent depegging event, especially for users concerned about stability.

That said, there's a paradox worth considering: if depeg insurance becomes standard, doesn't that inadvertently signal that depeg risk is inherent to the protocol? Insurance mechanisms typically acknowledge existing vulnerabilities rather than eliminate them. For USX holders, the question becomes whether the insurance framework actually strengthens the asset's peg stability, or simply compensates for underlying structural risks.

It's an interesting tension between risk mitigation and market perception in the stablecoin ecosystem.