Token buyback has traditionally been a common strategy for many projects during periods of price decline. The sluggish market conditions coupled with investor pressure have led project teams to spend real money to buy back their own tokens in the market, attempting to stabilize the price.



However, recently the trend has shifted. The Helium project team has started to reconsider this strategy and even announced the abandonment of their buyback plans. The underlying logic is not complicated—project teams' funds are also shrinking. When costs for investment, development, and operations are depleting reserves, allocating funds for token buybacks becomes a somewhat luxurious choice.

This reflects a real issue: not all projects can sustain aggressive token buyback strategies indefinitely. During market downturns, project teams need to find a balance between maintaining the ecosystem and preserving cash reserves. Some projects choose buybacks to soothe the market, while others are forced to adjust their strategies and allocate resources more rationally. This change also serves as a reminder to investors not to overly rely on project buybacks to support prices—sustainable project development and genuine use cases are the long-term foundations.
HNT-4.1%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainDoctorvip
· 01-06 07:48
Haha, finally a project dares to tell the truth. Their wallets are almost empty, yet they’re still putting on a buyback show. It’s a bit ironic. Really? I’m increasingly skeptical of those projects that are still aggressively repurchasing. Helium’s approach actually seems more honest, much more comfortable than those hard-talking projects. Wait, is this hinting that many projects are actually out of money? Buybacks are essentially just psychological comfort; the key is whether there’s real application support underneath. Stop expecting project teams to rescue the market all the time. Instead of speculating on that, it’s better to focus on the fundamentals. Has anyone tracked what happened to projects that abandoned buybacks? Actually, this is the market’s self-purification process. If you can’t play, don’t pretend. That’s the healthy way.
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmptyvip
· 01-05 02:10
It's about time to wake up; buybacks are just closing your eyes and stealing a bell. Helium's recent moves are actually honest, better than those who keep stubbornly holding on. To put it simply, if the money is gone, there's no need to pretend; the true skill is in sustaining the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegenvip
· 01-04 09:37
lmao helium finally admitting the buyback game was just copium all along. watched them dump treasuries like a degenerate on a losing streak, now suddenly "oh we need actual runway" 🤡 who would've thought
Reply0
IntrovertMetaversevip
· 01-04 09:25
Buyback rescue tactics have long been destined for bankruptcy. If the project has no money left, what are they forcing to sustain? --- Helium's recent move is quite honest; no more pretending, they just admit defeat. Much better than those still stubbornly holding on. --- Basically, it's because they have no money. No matter how aggressively they boasted before, now they have to bow their heads and behave. --- Wait, what happened to all those projects that previously promoted buybacks? Are they still pretending? Haha. --- Really, stop blindly trusting buybacks. They're just a smoke screen. Having a real product is the most important thing. --- Talking about tight funding in such a tactful way—just say there's no money left, and it's all over. --- This is what Web3 should look like. Admitting mistakes is always better than continuing to deceive investors. --- Laughable. Where did all those "unlimited buyback" promises go now? --- Instead of relying on buybacks, it's better to see how long the project can survive. That’s the real indicator.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuthvip
· 01-04 09:24
Honestly, the buyback rescue scheme has long been destined to fail. The project has no money left, yet they keep talking about buybacks. Genuine application and real returns are the way to go. Prices driven up by throwing money around will eventually collapse. Helium was actually honest this time, which is better than those false alarms. Once funded, they should focus on survival, rather than relying entirely on retail investors to take the hit. It's just another story of a liquidity crunch forcing a change of tone. This decision by Helium is actually wise; the money saved can be used more effectively. If the project team has no money, they shouldn't keep pretending. Instead of buybacks, they should focus on real work. Stop being fooled by buybacks. What's more important is to see what the project is actually doing.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt